OU Football Practice Notes 8.7.15

Image via OU Football Facebook

In case you missed it, we posted a few initial notes from yesterday’s practice here. Fortunately, I was able to track down a few more notes of interest:

– Firstly, I was told that for a first practice things were “very intense and very detailed.” This definitely didn’t sound like a ‘we are easing into things’ type of practice.

– As I mentioned in yesterday’s notes, Trevor Knight and Cody Thomas took the most QB reps but Baker Mayfield’s reps did gradually increase throughout the day. Was told that all of the quarterbacks look better, but one source I spoke to said that Cody Thomas seems to have made the biggest improvement.

Admittedly, however, it was just the first day, so it’s important to keep not only this but everything here in the proper context.

– Was told the biggest weapons on the field yesterday were Joe Mixon, Samaje Perine and Dede Westbrook. A source told me those three were even more dangerous than Sterling Shepard (bear in mind this is a person’s opinion AND just one practice).

– I wasn’t able to get a clear picture of the offensive line rotation because there seemed to be, well, quite a bit of rotation taking place. “They are looking to develop some depth,” was what one source mentioned. But the overall impression I got regarding the OL was positive.

– It does sound like, for the most part, the defense was running more of a 4-man front alignment with 1-tech, a 3-tech and a 5-tech DE with hands in the dirt and then a stand-up Jack LB/DE.

– As I mentioned in yesterday’s notes, Dwayne Orso was in the starting rotation at the 3-tech. But one source did mention that both he and Charles Walker shared reps pretty evenly at that spot.

– Was also told, to no one’s surprise, both Eric Striker and Devante Bond are playing that stand up DE position and sharing reps at the position. Also unsurprisingly, both are apparently very impressive. Was told that Striker appears even more explosive off the edge than he was in the past couple years. And we’ve heard Bond’s praises sung for a while, so no surprise that he’s looking good as well.

– Jordan Evans and Dom Alexander seem to be running with the 1’s the most at the two LB positions thus far, but Frank Shannon is also rotating in quite a bit. It’s too early to say at this point, but I got the sense from talking to folks that of the three experienced LBs, Evans is probably the most likely to start.

– Was also told that the defense was running mostly nickel with Steven Parker manning the nickel position.

– Again it seems Kahlil Haughton and PJ Mbanasor stood out. Was told they have both “stunned” some people. Haughton is running behind Ahmad Thomas at strong safety.

– I’m told Charles Tapper looks better than ever and didn’t seem to have any fatigue issues.

– Was also told that Ricky Deberry looked very good. He’s playing the stand up DE position, however, so one would think it is going to be next to impossible for him to see the field if they keep him in that spot with both Striker and Bond ahead of him on the depth chart. But it’s obviously still encouraging to hear he looks good early on.

– Also of note, Ogbonnia Okoronkwo has moved to strong side defensive end behind Tapper. Though if you’ve seen any pictures of him lately it might not come as that big a surprise. He has put on some considerable good weight and already flashed at times last year with an ability to get to the quarterback.

– It sounds like overall it was a quality opening practice and the energy is very high. I know right now it’s tough for some fans to be optimistic, but I say throw last season out the window and get excited. There’s plenty of time to complain, but this is supposed to be a fun time of the year full of hope and potential 🙂

178 Comments

  • Jordan Esco says:

    I know I say this probably far too often, so forgive me for annoying some of you. But the fact K can get stuff like this and put it out for free is, frankly, pretty unbelievable.

    That is all, just felt like that needed to be said. Enjoy the rest of your Friday.

  • Soonerfandave84 says:

    Thanks K, awesome stuff. If Dede is really better than Shep then GL B12 defenses. And on Cody Thomas, I still think he has the most accuracy of the bunch and if he catches up on the speed of reading the defense he should be the starter.

    • boomersooner says:

      Haha. He kind of said that in a “don’t shoot the messenger” type way didn’t he? I think it’s awesome that shep is 4th impressive. That’s explosive and will lead to healthy competition between all those athletes and healthy leads in ballgames

      • Nate Broadus says:

        When Westbrook broke out in the Spring, my hope was that OU would have two homerun threats at WR.

        With Mixon out there, who has some of the best hands on the team, we could have a lethal receiving group.

        • boomersooner says:

          Yeah especially with all the biguns we got too. Can’t wait to see what Riley draws up

  • Dwebb96 says:

    Wow! Thanks for the detailed report. Obviously just the first day of practice, but the mood seems to be much more focused. Can’t wait for the pads to be put on.

  • Brandon says:

    exactly, offense could be scary with all the weapons and I love to here actual competition at the d line spots maybe we can get after the qb this year and cause more turnovers.

    • Soonerfandave84 says:

      I looked it up a week or two ago OU was 95th in turnover margin last year…(-5 on the season)

      http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/29/p2

      • Eric Hoffpauir says:

        I can think of a few games where if we had cut the turnovers by one, we would have won the game.

        • Soonerfandave84 says:

          TCU, KSU, Perine getting injured and fumbling on the same play vs OSU

          • Matt says:

            I also think that if they’re winning all of those games, the Baylor game might go different and I definitely think the team would’ve been more invested in the bowl game and that definitely would’ve turned out differently

          • Soonerfandave84 says:

            Even Tapper commented on them quitting in the Baylor game

          • Brad Warren says:

            Dan Cody begging SC to just run the clock out. Hate to hear of quitting. I’m not completely unrealistic in thinking we were going to come back and win either, but play the Damn game out hard. For pride if nothing else.

  • Jason Vos says:

    Aagin, watch out for that boy Cody Thomas. Said it numerous times:)

    Particularly his arm strength and the fact the can throw the ball from number to number

    • hemisooner says:

      it does help he didn’t play baseball and mess up his mechanics

    • SoonerOracle737 says:

      CT is my candidate with the highest ceiling. He has all the physical tools. Just has to put it together. I hope they all do too.

    • stan H says:

      I’ve hoped that it would start slowing down for Cody. It’s my opinion that he provides the most upside at QB and could to be the next great Sooner QB.

    • Nate Broadus says:

      The moment word got out about Lincoln Riley’s hiring, Cody Thomas popped up in my mind.

      When word got out that Cody Thomas was dropping baseball to focus on football full time, my eyebrow raised.

      Last year he was tossed into Hell. He had an OC that seemed to have checked out. A receiving corp without Sterling Shepard, and essentially was just a handoff guy for Samaje Perine.

      With Lincoln Riley in charge of the offense, Cody Thomas finally gets to run an offense that he QB’ed to huge numbers in high school. Make no mistake, Thomas is a pocket passer. His skill set coming in was made for an Air Raid kind of system.

      If he’s not on everyone’s watch list for starter, he may well be as the season nears.

  • Sooner born, Sooner bred says:

    Always great information Super K. Still hoping you guys manufacture a XXX-Large in your shirts. Just had a physical and came in at 6’3 and 322 lbs. Doc says I need to lose some weight……duh! Easier said than done. Anyway, you guys are the best. Boomer! Sooner! OU ☝

    • hemisooner says:

      baby steps. Eat more smaller meals and no carbs after 7pm. Most of all good luck on your weight loss. BOOMER

      • John Garner says:

        Good suggestion. Throw in some running as well.

        • hemisooner says:

          you guys are big guys so I would gradually build up to do interval training. Start walking on the treadmill at 5% incline for 20 minutes. Once you get that down throw a jog in there for 1 min and 1 min walking. if you drink sodas just stop drinking the poison.

      • Sooner born, Sooner bred says:

        Thanks…..fortunately people say I carry it well. Blood pressure a little high though and it runs in my family. Gotta get it under control as I have another grandchild due any day. Another Sooner born, Sooner bred!

        • hemisooner says:

          People said the same thing to me. I was 5’11” 225 and pretty solid but felt like crap. now I’m 170 and can go grapple and don’t feel like death is upon me. Plus i’m more active at 43 than 33

          • Mr. Jones says:

            BJJ?

            Edit: Nevermind, I just looked at your avi. I’ve been training for about a year and a half and I really enjoy it! I train under Clinch in Tulsa. Where do you train?

          • hemisooner says:

            Yes

          • hemisooner says:

            I train under sandro sampaio, a carlson gracie black belt. Been doing it for around 7 years along with some MMA training (moto mma in moore). You go to any tournaments?

          • Mr. Jones says:

            Very nice. I’ve watched a couple and was going to enter one last year but got injured a month before.

    • John Garner says:

      Geez, those are my exact measurables as well. And my Doc said the same thing: lose weight. I may have to get a divorce, though, to do that. My wife is such a damn fine cook.

      • Sooner born, Sooner bred says:

        Yeah buddy…..I understand completely. I tend to work hard and play harder. Need to bring it down a notch, but this is my favorite time of year. Anyone say….Oklahoma drill. Just hope everyone stays healthy.

      • soonerthunder says:

        A/f your divorce, pls publish her name and I know she’ll have a line of men ready to marry her!

      • roygbell says:

        Losing weight is easy. Get rid of the junk food. No chips, no cookies, no ice cream … I don’t consume empty calories … make your calories count. For God’s sake get the pasta out of your diet. My wife and I go to Braums every other Sunday and treat ourselves to what ever we want … ice cream, hot fudge, nuts, whip cream etc. Plus, when we go out with friends on Friday/Saturday night we don’t worry about what we eat.

        Here is my diet [I’m also over 65] I am at my high school playing weight. I limit my carbs to no more than 25% of my calories and the rest is protein and fat, mostly protein. The carbs I consume come from a limited amount of cereal grains and such things as fruit and veggies. I eat lots of good ole meat. I also use a whey based protein powder on occasion in a smoothie with a little fruit. I consume lots of eggs and cheese. I consume four or five pounds of meat every week. I am done eating before 6:00pm every day, except when we go out to eat with friends. I don’t consume much alcohol and don’t smoke either

        This isn’t just a fad diet for me as I have been doing this for most of my life. I also keep an eye on my health. I don’t have cholesterol issues and do a stress test every few years and have no heart issues. So, I also advise anyone to make sure your DR knows your diet. My GP and heart Doc think my diet is perfect for me. I don’t push it as I am fortunate in that I eat three eggs a day and all the red meat I want and have no issues, but not everyone can do this.

        I don’t go overboard on the exercise bit, but I do walk two miles almost every week day.

        The key to losing weight is getting the junk carbs out of your diet. I love chips and ice cream and never met a dessert I didn’t like. Figure out what a cup is and stick to it. I also eat a good protein laced breakfast every morning and the rest of the day I will snack until about 5:00 pm when I eat a solid evening meal.

        The key is getting the empty carbs out of your diet.

        • MrBigsby says:

          You lost me at “don’t consume much alcohol”. I now feel sorry for your old, scrawny ass!

          • EasTex says:

            LOL!
            I’m 64, eat anything I want at any time and I have been about the same girth and weight for about ten years.
            I don’t drink alcohol ever! Not for about 40 years, when I discovered that alcoholic beverages are the urine and poop of microorganisms. No sir, I won’t drink toxic excretions.

          • Scott Moore says:

            Stop drinking, lose a lot. If you are a regular, that is for sure. I make myself not drink during the week and keep it to a couple nights on the weekend. Trying not to ever over due it. (get sloppy drunk) It’s an alternative for those not willing to go completely sober. But you are right East Tex. Better not to indulge at all.

          • EasTex says:

            The worst thing about its toxicity is it is a sugar molecule with a R attached. Which allows it to penetrate the blood brain barrier, where that toxic excretion proceeds to kill brain cells.
            Bad Hoo-Doo, that Devil’s brew.

      • stan H says:

        Well I’m clearly at a weight advantage over you.

        • John Garner says:

          Well, okay then, you play Tackle, and I’ll play Guard. I think I have some eligibility left.

    • Perry Dickey says:

      Way I like to splain’ it is a carbohydrate is a ‘simple’ sugar. Since their molecular structure is ‘simple’ your body breaks them down first. So, if you consume them your body is a sugar burner and saves the fat stores for later. Eliminate the easy stuff and you immediately begin to consume the fat. Also realize just going through the day you burn calories, lots of calories, heck even eating breakfast burns calories. I say this only to help you realize if your burning calories just by living any bit of ‘extra’ help (exercise) will put you in the minus on the scale!

    • D Hunter Sanchez says:

      Hard indeed. But I was at 223 3 months ago, now 199. Doctor recommended no carbs. He lost 70 lbs himself.

      Mon-Fri steak/chicken, eggs, and a salad, fruit and water or cran-grape juice. Friday 2 beers and Sunday some potatoes or rice or pasta. Walking 30 minutes a day Sunday off. Done.

    • Scott Moore says:

      Man, I was lifting weights hoping to lose weight and after a year I was in much better shape, but still over weight. I broke my shoulder and a couple ribs a little over a month ago and said to myself, can’t work out, need to change eating habits. Started eating fruit, vegetables and fish only. Drinking only water. With very little physical activity I dropped 10 pounds in a week. Nearly 20 in about 3 weeks. So from 222 to to around 205. Shocking. And I had done cleanses and all that crap before. Just cutting out all fried foods and beef helps a lot. Then once you lose it you can reward yourself with a nice steak or burger now and again. And man it tastes good. Good luck brother.

  • Mr. Jones says:

    Good to hear about Obo. Seems like one of those athletes that you just need to get on the field and let loose.

  • John Garner says:

    Thanks Super K. Practice notes always appreciated. It’s not too tough for me to be optimistic. I love that the first practice was intense and detail-oriented. Bodes well for the change in coaches.

  • soonerthunder says:

    Who’s running FS w/Thomas/Haughton running SS and Parker @ NB?

      • Randy says:

        This is why I would rather have 4 LBs on the field..

        • Jordan Esco says:

          Against three or four-wide (which is why you’d be in the nickel to begin with)?

          That’s not going to happen, nor should you want it to, IMO.

          • SoonerOracle737 says:

            I’m just hoping the backfield gets much better and in a hurry. We need to turn that part of the D into a strength instead of the glaring weakness it was in the past.

          • soonerthunder says:

            I look for a big jump in improvement for three main reasons:

            1) Usually the biggest improvement is between the FR and SO yrs, so I think CB Thomas and Parker will be greatly improved this yr. I think Parker can be as good as any safety that has played at OU, I think he is that good;

            2) I look for improvement from Thomas, Byrd, Thomas and Parker b/c they have a yr under their belts seeing Big 12 Os. If you look at OSU, TT, ISU or even Tulsa, when they have returning DBs they usually do better the next yr b/c the yr’s experience, not b/c they are so outstandingly talented;

            3) The DL will be more of an attack DL rather than so much a stop the run first and contain as we were last yr. This will mean that the DBs won’t be called upon to hold their coverage so long. However, I do expect us to be a little worse against the run as a result.

            There could be other reasons too, like playing more of a 4 front, like all the DBs in the same film room w/the same coach on the same page together, or like having a DB coach who actually has coached DBs, and I have a theory b/c we won’t have a NG who takes plays off. I know Phillips is a phenomenal athlete, but I have a theory that a guy who might not be quite as good who doesn’t take plays off is better overall than one who is superior but does take plays off, but if I added these reasons that wouldn’t make “three” reasons.

            Also, I think BS will have the Big 12 officials ready to call back any play for TD from KSU where they purposely have an OL downfield and our safeties leave coverage for the run and are left looking stupid with a WR wide-open behind them. I bet BS will have the officials looking to call that penalty at the sniff of an OL moving past the LOS. All those things will help make the safeties look better IMO.

          • SoonerOracle737 says:

            I like your analysis. And yes, that KSU downfield rules violation play needs to be called every single time. I was screaming at the tv set every time it happened. It needs to be called just to save my health.

          • Fear The Magic says:

            Sanchez a year more experienced. Thomas a year more experienced ( also was very new to the position a year ago ). Byrd and Thomas a year more experienced. Parker a year more experienced and was already improving fast by the end of last year. Backups MBanasor and Haughton look to be solid if not exceptional down the road.’ll
            A new and improved coach in Cooks. Better communication ( key ).
            Mike up in the press box where he cant annoy everyone.
            Conclusion, We’ll DEFINITELY be improved and maybe by a good margin.

          • SoonerOracle737 says:

            Do you think they will be good enough to slow down Baylor? We need to get them to that level, but I was wondering how just what level we can expect?

          • Fear The Magic says:

            Stop them? I doubt it but I very much believe we wont see a repeat performance of last year. I think we’ll be holding them in the 35 point range. Now the question is will they be able to stop us?

          • Drew says:

            Well, though we weren’t able to keep it up, the last two years we were actually winning going into the (2nd?) quarter. So it’s not like we can’t stop them. Personally, I think the inability of the O to move the ball gave Baylor’s O too many opportunities to figure out how to exploit us. So, if Riley can get the O back to snuff, I actually wouldn’t be surprised to see the score flipped this year.

            Full Disclaimer: Didn’t actually watch either of the last 2 Baylor games, so I could be completely off. But my memory of the early game stats gives me hope.

          • hemisooner says:

            look at Alabama D. It hasn’t worked for them against spread teams.

          • Fear The Magic says:

            Yeah but Alabama doesnt have the talent that we do.

          • hemisooner says:

            i was saying that 4 LBs against the spread isn’t a good idea

          • Fear The Magic says:

            I know…I was trying ( unsuccessfully ) to be funny.

          • soonerthunder says:

            i got it. loved it

          • hemisooner says:

            hahaha please forgive me i have been hit in the head too many times

          • Randy says:

            No, it won’t happen. Just the thought of Thomas and Byrd covering the back end scares the “ish” out of me.. Parker (I think) has a better feel back there but still scares me. I say stop the short sideline to sideline stuff don’t let them gut you with a pop run up the middle then get to the QB make him make mistakes.. The LBs can do this..

  • hemisooner says:

    Byrd at FS backup by Prentice when in the Nickel package would be my guess

  • Randy says:

    So if Tapper is a 5, and we would assume Romar is the 1 and Orso and Walker at the 3 would Striker still be considered the 4th lineman or a OLB he will never be confused with a DLmen. Sounds like if they are in Nickel then it is a 3-3-5, I like it either way. Striker closer to the LOS is a good thing. Him and Bond are SR, DeBerry is a true freshman he doesn’t need to play much just get better for ’16. I still like the depth at LB and would be more comfortable with all 4 at there as long as Evans is opposite of Striker with Alexander and Shannon in the middle.

    • Sooner 76 says:

      WDE (7)
      Erik Striker 19 (Sr)
      Devante Bond 23 (Sr)

      DT (3)
      Charles Walker 97 (RS So)
      Dwayne Orso 99 (RS Fr)

      NT (1)
      Matthew Romar 92 (RS So)
      Jordan Wade 93 (RS Jr)

      SDE (5)
      Charles Tapper 91 (Sr)
      Ogbonnia Okoronkwo 31 (RS So)

  • Jason Vos says:

    Nice

    • Randy says:

      That looks correct to me..

    • wolfbuilder says:

      I can also see where they could run a true 1,3 5,5 with a walk up olb being striker like they did with Roger steffen

      • Sooner 76 says:

        The difference is that Steffen was a strong side OLB lined up on the LOS. In the new alignment, Striker is usually on the weak side, which is probably better for him. He played the SAM last year and wasn’t nearly effective as he was as a sophomore as a Jack LBer, IMO.

        • wolfbuilder says:

          How do we know what the new alignment is, other then a 4 front, all I was getting to is I bet the use that formation where he is lined up over a te or some type of wing who’s can be on the sam side or the will side. My money’s one we run a few different sets, like in a base we set 4-3 and 3-4 or 5-2 I call it a 5-2 cause we use a ng, 2 dt/4i, and 9/7 which r the end man on the line which is a Dend which is what Grissom and striker played

          • Sooner 76 says:

            Excellent question, my friend.

            I taped the spring game and watched parts of it 3 times to get an understanding of the new D system.

            You are correct, they ran both a 3-4-4 and a 4-2-5 in the spring game, with a standup DE (Striker), usually on the weak side, when in the latter alignment. They have a 3-technique DT (Walker or Orso) beside the DE, then a NT (Romar), and then a strong side DE (Tapper).

          • wolfbuilder says:

            Now u do realize that they ran a 3 front in the spring game almost every snap and what I have been talking about is a 4 front,right?

    • BoomerDave says:

      I’ve Bob say that they will look to get both Striker and Bond on the field a lot at the same time.

      • Boom says:

        That is a good thing and I hope it’s more than less. I would like for Bond to be the SS LB on the line whereas Striker comes of the WS or QB backside.

      • Drew says:

        Good. They’re both amazing pass rushers, so having them on the opposite sides of the line should pin the QB in.

  • wolfbuilder says:

    I always said I don’t care who starts but my money was on Mayfield and Cody as number 2, I love Trevor as a person but he was so bad on so many short easy throws, hope he has changed that, but we will know in a few week

  • Randy says:

    I think we should call the OLB, DE, overhang, 7, 9wide position “Striker”. Simple, self explanatory and if he gets 15 sacks this year it will catch on nationally and recruits like that..

    • Chris White says:

      I agree, that outside linebacker/DE pass rusher should be called the “Striker” position

    • RocketCitySooner says:

      Good idea but suggest we wait till Striker graduates. Don’t want to send the message that he ‘owns’ the position.

      • Randy says:

        But he does own it.. I would like to see a 6’5 260 kid own it next year.. Austin Roberts.

      • OUWade says:

        weren’t we (and the coaches) calling the safety/linebacker hybrid position the “Roy-backer” when Roy Williams was a sophomore. Honest question. I feel like it had already caught on when Williams was playing his final year.

  • Sooner4life says:

    All I know is all this football talk is getting me excited! Can’t thank TFB enough for this information and allowing us as fans to be a part of it.

  • thebigdroot says:

    Any news on Flowers?

    • Matt says:

      he tweeted earlier this summer that he loves the new offense so that seemed encouraging about his role in it…to me anyway

  • blaster1371 says:

    This is why I favor college football over the NFL- the next season offers excitement as it is virtually a new team, even with many of the same players.

  • blaster1371 says:

    Also, with Woods still MIA Baxter (name of the new JC WR?) might be getting his scholarship after all.

  • Jason Vos says:

    we are loaded 3 deep on the dline and Austin Roberts is not even on campus yet

  • Robertson / Robertson 2016 says:

    Obo a better Geno than Geno?

    Obeno? Gobo? Obogeno?

  • Fear The Magic says:

    I love the depth that we’re developing on defense. We’ll need it when we play the fast pace teams like baylor. Maybe we should just have shifts. Something to the effect of 1’s 1’s 2’s 1’s 1’s 2’s. Give the first team a breather set of downs. It looks like we will have the talent to carry that off.

    • Sooner 76 says:

      We will certainly rotate the dline with at two deep and perhaps three deep at times. The depth is certainly there.

      If anyone doesn’t think dline depth is important, watch the 4th Q of the 2003 LSU game. They stomped our O for 3 Q, and then we took over the game in the 4th as their dline was gassed. If we could have tied the game, OT was never in doubt.

      I expect to see Shannon, Evans, and Dom at various times. OU has never really rotated much at LBer and DB, however.

      • Bob Edwards says:

        Not sure we ever had the LB depth under VB. He seemed to always be able to get a couple of guys ready and then not a lot behind them.

        • Sooner 76 says:

          That’s exactly right, Bob. He always seemed to have quality first teamers, but rarely had decent backups. When RR went down, it cost us an NC in all likelihood.

  • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

    I am suing TFB for the increased excitement levels that are likely to strain and damage my heart. This reporting of my beloved OU regarding what’s happening and how they look is like walking a 4-year old into FAO Schwarz.

    And when I sue TFB for eleventy billion dollars I’m giving it back to them to pay for this information that we’re all getting for free.

  • John McCroskey says:

    Sounds like SSDD with the defense.

  • RBear says:

    So, question for those x’s and o’s types out there…

    Do you think:

    1) we have the personnel to stunt and blitz (successfully)

    2) a scheme to do so

    I just wanna see a HUNGRY and AGGRESSIVE D

    Thanks in advance.

    • SamSooner says:

      I’m more practical. So, I’ll attempt to answer your question with this: from my observation, stunts and blitzes are done either by necessity(you don’t have quality personnel) or you have the quality personnel and you just in enjoy torturing people.

      Stunting and blitzing out of necessity, says you’re limited in your ability to over power your opponent so you need to surprise or attempt to confuse them. Part of that is due to scouting. If the report tells you a team has problems handling stunts or blitzes, then stunt and blitz. But sometimes, stunts and blitzing is meant to mask a weakness which a good team will expose and burn you. That will lead to less of each.

      Quality personnel, means you have the personnel overpower your opponent anytime and anywhere. I can play you straight up and win most of the day. However, stunting and blitzing when you have quality personnel is meant to reward some sick, twisted pleasure of landing the “coup de grace” and long as your opponent in content to get up and take more.

      This is a young team with a lot of experience. I think OU will finally have enough quality personnel (mentally and physically) on the field at the same time that they will not be limited in what they choose to do, whenever they want to do it.

      Mike is aggressive, we know this. I think he will finally be able to do what he wants to do with his defense. This defense will allow him to be a little bit more reckless.

      Just my thought.

      • RBear says:

        Thanks for the well thought out reply.

        In my mind, Boz was the epitome of an attacking mentality and those D’s were not masking any weakness really, just aggressive and suffocating.

        I want the opposition to fear us, to line up, see the look in our eyes and piss themselves.

        Am I asking too much 😉

      • Sooner 76 says:

        Good thoughts. My opinion is that Striker will be more effective in his new role, b/c he can concentrate on rushing the passer from the weak side. Playing strongside OLBer did not fit his skill set last year–his measureables perhaps–but not his skill set. Big difference.

      • JB says:

        I have to disagree on the blitzing front. I do not think it signifies a weakness in your ability to defend. It’s a scheme or philosophy you believe in or you don’t, same as running the wishbone, veer, West coast or other offense. Buddy Ryan had the philosophy that he wasn’t going to sit and wait and let you throw on him, dictating the flow of the game. His philosophy was the defense should attack the offense and dictate what the offense does. lots of pressure from multiple angles creating confusion, heavy man coverage, physical play.

        We have been adding more DBs and playing more zone, and we keep getting torched by teams that can throw. The key to defending these Big 12 offenses is to hit the QB in the mouth, play after play. Make him want to get rid of the ball and stop taking hits. Disrupt his timing. Force him to make a mistake.

        WVU beat Baylor by blitzing the crap out of them and it worked. We tried the soft zone read and react crap, and we were lut up on our home field by Baylor.

        • JB says:

          Even if going to an attacking, blitzing scheme were the sign of a team that lacked talent on D or wasn’t very good on D, well, how good was our D last year? Answer: BAD…WAY BAD…ALL FORMS OF BAD.

        • SamSooner says:

          I like what you said: “The key to defending these Big 12 offenses is to hit the QB in the mouth, play after play. Make him want to get rid of the ball and stop taking hits. Disrupt his timing. Force him to make a mistake.”

          No argument with that logic. Good points.

        • Eric Hoffpauir says:

          Well said.

        • EasTex says:

          Buddy Ryan was my next door neighbor for one year and Phil Bennett lived across the street from me for many years.
          It should come as no surprise what my philosophy is…ATTACK!
          If not, you are being attacked.

  • Matt says:

    Are all of the new coaches that Bob brought in more interested in teaching and correcting than screaming? It sounds like Cooks definitely is but I haven’t heard about Diron’s
    or Simmons’s style…If they are teachers, that gets me really excited because I
    think OU will be getting out in front of a lot of other programs with this
    coaching style while a lot of other programs are still trying to scream their
    way to championships.

    • JB says:

      Given Diron was part of Dungy’s staff at Indy, I’d bet he’s a much more even tempered guy.

  • bjwalker82 says:

    “Was told that Striker appears even more explosive off the edge than he was in the past couple years.”

    How is that even possible??

  • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

    Steven Parker is the bigger nickel, so far. What could that mean?

    Steven will play closer to the line, helping with the run game and covering the flat (a little Roy Williams)?

    Steven will play the slot man-to-man and be a cover nickel?

    Also, is what we’re reading, seeing, hearing what Mike Stoops would rather have installed years ago, but couldn’t?

    Is what we’re reading, seeing, and hearing more similar to OU’s 2000-2004 defenses?

  • Sacramento Sooner says:

    New to the site in the last several months. Living in Cali, you guys are like an Oasis in the Desert with the constant Sooner news! Love this site and all the info you crank out. Thanks for all the hard work!

  • Sooner Man says:

    What about Curtis Bolton and Dalton Rodriquez? Then how is Courtney Garnett and Jordan Smallwood coming off injuries?

  • JB says:

    “It does sound like, for the most part, the defense was running more of a 4-man front alignment with 1-tech, a 3-tech and a 5-tech DE with hands in the dirt and then a stand-up Jack LB/DE.”

    I just hope we will be bringing more than 4 on most downs so we can actually put some pressure on the opposing QBs. 4 men alone won’t cut it. We tried that too much last year with a 1 technique and two 3s, plus Striker. It was highly ineffective. I think we need to do a lot more than slide a 3 technique to a 5.

    • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

      Perhaps they will, but a team like Baylor may force opposing DCs to reconsider their strategy (or at least modify it). For example,…

      http://i4.minus.com/i2qWrUWuEIDZP.jpeg

      • SamSooner says:

        Here’s what I would do to figure out how to defend that play: I would line my offense up in the same set as Baylor, see how they would defend their own play, essentially.

        That play is forcing 1:1 coverage with tons of space to operate, favoring Baylor.

        You could, concede the run. They might march it down the field but you’re not giving up big plays. Your LBs won’t have to guess run pass because they’re playing pass until they see it’s a run play. In addition, dropping the your DL five yards off the ball, plus your LBs will eliminate routes for the receiver: you’re shrinking the field for the receivers.

        You’re essentially eliminating any routes over the middle.

        That’s how I would defend their offense. I might be out of a job after year one. But, this is how I would do it.

        • Stephen says:

          Those DB’s at 10 yards off though.

          • SamSooner says:

            I know. I’d bring them closer. The two safeties are for pass support. Dropping the DL 5 yards takes away short routes over the middle.

          • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

            I wouldn’t do that with Sanchez. He’s not fast enough. Julian was fast enough. The closer you bring them the more able they need to be to run with the WRs.

        • JD says:

          I would turn the Jack lose and blitz from another spot on occasion but run this only on passing downs and mix it up so they wouldn’t audible into run on me…key is picking your moments and being a step ahead of the OC (Briles in this case)…and yes Id have some press to prevent the quit outs like the first series of the second half last year against Julian…made me sick and knew the game was over on that series…not sure how mobile their new qb will be but you have to account for that too

        • EasTex says:

          I concede nothing….ATTACK-ATTACK-ATTACK!!!

        • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

          The safety to the top seems to be helping the 2 CBs. The safety at the bottom near the XII is responsible for the flat. That leaves the boundary CB 1v1. The LBs have responsibility for the RB and QB. While some QBs are not terribly mobile, they have to be accounted for, to some degree.

          Thus, there are 4 DL being blocked by 5 OL.

          If you concede the run, then it could be a big play. One missed tackle is all it needs. Baylor is really tricky. I think you have to be able to clog gaps and get pressure (doesn’t have to be sacks) with 4 DL.

          Press and bail technique could work, but the CBs have to be fast. Baylor’s WRs are track speed fast. They could run 3 verticals and cause problems.

          You could continue to move the .05 closer to the line and just concede the 1v1 to the boundary. At least, you can use the boundary as another defender.

          If there is enough time and if the FS is athletic enough to be a good blitzer, then you could send the FS on a field-side blitz and have the .05 bail to the middle.

          Baylor puts teams in 1v1s constantly. I can understand that many thought OU was embarrassed when they marched right down the field on us. For sure, they were. However, Baylor creates these dilemmas.

          Can you imagine if Baylor came with 4 wide? Saban had fits with 4 wide (2 by 2). It’s hard to defend.

  • hOUligan says:

    Man, it ain’t a lot so far, but it sure is good to read about football players playing football and some breakdowns by the TFB staff and more knowledgeable readers about what it means. Cool water for the thirsty. Thnx!!

  • Slim Sooner says:

    Hallelujah, our guys are finally back on the football field and getting in gear for a better year in 2015. I could read this stuff all day, thanks K. This fan doesn’t have a tough time at all being optimistic, just thankful for a new start and blessed to be a Sooner!

  • EasTex says:

    Sounds good, Super K.
    Glad to hear the anticipation and energy are at high levels. Sure they hope they don’t hurt each other to badly when the pads go on next week.
    Of the members of this outstanding incoming class the one that I am most interested in hearing/seeing when the hitting starts is Gallimore. I think he will be even more of a force in the DL than Jordan Phillips.

    • Fear The Magic says:

      Im looking forward to watching Gallimore as well. I think hes going to be a monster.
      I think we should get everyone in the stands to sing “Oh Canada” every time he gets a sack.

      • EasTex says:

        I think he already is a monster, he just needs a mission.

      • BleedCrimson says:

        They would have to use the telepromter because most folks will only know the words “Oh Canada”. 😮
        But, I do like it.

      • Jed says:

        Or the Ontario Provincial Anthem:

        Land of the tallest tree,
        Stand by me!

        A place to stand,
        A place to grow,
        Ontari-ari-ariO!

  • Fear The Magic says:

    Im having visions of three Tennessee players being carried off the field the very first time Mixon touches the ball.
    Diagnosis: 3 broken ankles.

  • Hooknladder says:

    Awesome report and I agree- clean slate; let’s git er done!

  • Hollerback says:

    With all the talented LBs, why on earth are they switching from the 3-4 to the 4-2 this year????

  • Coach K says:

    Have you guys heard how much Mixon will actually play? I have heard that he is only in 1 or 2 formations right now. Of course that might be that it was his practices and he wasn’t playing in spring game.

    Just curios. Thanks.