So here we go with the 2nd quarter:
1. This is a shot of us pre-snap on the 2nd and goal to start the 2nd quarter. What really hurt us here is that we’re backed up after the unforced error of 12 men in the huddle. We come back to the weak side of the formation (offense’s left) on the zone read. This play just validates the numbers argument I’ve been talking about. Baylor has far less players to our left. One could argue that we do too, but the point is that you have more room to make a move on someone if you don’t block it as cleanly and there are less opportunities to make mistakes (less moving parts):
1. (cont.) Here, the small red arrow is pointing at Adam Shead, who misses the linebacker. In Adam’s defense it’s a really tough block, and one I’d like to see Clay come and help on as he doesn’t get the ball. If we make that block, Trevor may have scored. Still like I said in that last picture, with less numbers you allow yourself not to block it as cleanly and still be successful. While we didn’t execute it perfectly, it’s still a gain of four yards, because there’s more space.
2. On the 3rd and Goal play, Blake has to have better vision than this. Adam Shead is pulling around right in front of him, but if you follow the red arrow, Nila has his guy kicked out, and Damien’s leading up in the hole. Look at the gap that’s opening up to the right. Blake has to see that!
2. cont. Here a tick later, you see the hole widening out to the right, and even one developing to the left. Damien’s still looking for someone to block and probably wondering why Blake isn’t following him. What’s more baffling is this…look at the bottom of the “Y” in the endzone. Brannon green has his guy two yards deep in the endzone. He’s shown good hands. Why hasn’t he been playing all year? He can drive a guy two yards deep into the endzone, but he’s not “physical” enough? Please.
2. cont. Here a tick later, you see lanes to both the left and the right that Blake could have taken. Undoubtedly, he walks into the endzone if he keeps his eyes up and sees it. So frustrating. This is one of those holes to the right that “you could drive a truck through”. Of course the fans will blame this one on the O-line too.
3. Here again, they’ve got six guys strong and four guys weak. It was hard to get a screenshot on this one because we were going up tempo here. Again hoping to catch them off guard. We’re the friggin University of Oklahoma! Why are we trying to be cheap?! Line up, see what they have and adjust. Going pace on the goal line just tells your guys you don’t believe in their abilities to out muscle them and score.
3. cont. Running into numbers gives the opponent more opportunities to make plays. More players = more chances. Here, the safety makes a good play, and Damien doesn’t work “inside-out”. Their safety number 8 is the left blue arrow and Damien is the right blue arrow. I paused it here so you can see Damien having that oh-shat moment, where he sinks and tries to come back inside. That safety is upfield in a hurry, and Damien has to be looking back inside on this. He doesn’t, and 8 makes a great submarine tackle on Bell. To further validate the numbers point, even if Damien makes the block here, you still have an unblocked defender. He’s the player with the red arrow pointing to where his gap responsibilities are. Stop for a moment and look back weak though. If we bring Damien back across the formation here and run some switchblade action where Blake moves that way and hands it back to Damien coming left, we most likely score. Heck you could even have Damien lead across for Bell. Either way, there’s a lot less guys to the left here and we come away with zero points.
4. If you ever wondered what “in the box” means…I drew a box for you. This defensive formation is a good example of how one play influences another. The play before, we ran a quick out route to Jalen. Baylor’s conscious of it on this play, so they back off of it a little bit. They had just stopped us on a fourth and goal, so naturally we’re not going to have the stones to attack them running again. They guessed right. If you look in the box I’ve drawn, I put a line straight north and south through Irwin(the right guard), to show that they’re overloading our offensive left. To our left, they have five guys in the box, and to our right they have four. X marks the spot, and would be the area I would attack here. Guard, Tackle, Tight End plus Fullback equals four on four. Check to it in the booth and give it on a quick hitter to that side. No way Baylor reacts quick enough here, since they’re too far back off of the line of scrimmage. We end up throwing an incompletion here, but there’s a soft spot here we didn’t attack.
5. Remind me why we’re running the no huddle again? What’s that you say? Oh yeah, so we can check alignments and get to the best play based on what the defense gives us. Copy. Sticking with my box theme here, look on the left side of the offensive line. There’s a nose, shaded to Ikard’s left, and a 5 outside of Thompson. The middle backer is actually on the right side of the hash, and the other backer is walked out to the bottom left corner of the box. This is just easy money if we check to a run play here and bring Clay across right behind Shead and Thompson. Since that Mike backer is to the right a little, this would be an easy block for Shead after he combed the nose with Ikard, and Thompson would be one on one with the 5. The only guy that Clay would have to beat would be that outside backer to the bottom left of the box. It would be a possible gain of five or six yards. Do we attack a soft run formation? NOPE! We throw a pass, luck out and get an unnecessary roughness penalty. Remind me again why we run the no huddle?
6. What’s this? Under Center?! I Formation?! The beautiful simplicity of the I formation and being under center, is that you don’t tip your hand. Teams have to line up over your blockers, but you aren’t tipping which way you’re going. We do a great job on this play going back weak(where they have less numbers).
6. cont. Here a split second later, you see Rip has his guy on the ground(rt circle), Tyrus is blocking(left circle), and we’re off and running. Clay ends up gaining nine here, and we could have easily gone back to this. This is what I mean when I pose the question about why are we trying to be pretty and cheap? We could get under center in the I formation, and gash people. If we would throw the ball to the tight end once in a while, we could really chop em up (and no a last ditch attempt in the 2nd half on a deep pattern when we haven’t run the ball well isn’t going to work).
6. cont. This is just a great job blocking up front, and Clay getting north and south in a hurry. We end up gashing them for a gain of nine. See those Baylor defenders behind the red line? That’s what I mean about them getting caught up in the wash.
7. Here on 3rd and 10, check the body language of the three Baylor defenders I’m pointing at. They’re coming. We only have 6 to block 7.
7. cont. Right after the snap, they’re full tilt. This is cover zero. Man coverage with no safety help. Blake has no choice but to get rid of it quickly and he does. Baylor decided they were going to dictate the pace against us and they did.
22 Comments
thanks again for the formation break downs….I know nothing about formations and how to exploit them, so I’ll look for that moving forward, but what I did know watching the game live was we should have run that I Formation and PA pass off of it the rest of the game… it worked and worked well. But we instead ran it I believe only those 2 times the whole game and averaged 9yards per play on both plays…
We could be so much more than what we are man. It’s really tough to understand when you have the horses up front and at the tight end spot to block. All you’d have to do is throw one or two times a game to that tight end to get em to respect it. LB’s couldn’t suck up in there and they’d have to honor that as a pass threat. Even if you never use it, it has to be a threat.
Thanks for another good breakdown JY! I agree we could have easily taken a big lead on them if the offense had done its part. I remember watching in the beginning and thinking how nervous Petty looked. If offense had put some points on the board it would have put Petty under more pressure and I think our defense would have made him fold…Also seemed like the ineffectiveness of our offense really frustrated the defense and their body language totally changed as the game went on…Too much coulda woulda shoulda…
Thanks 786! I agree with you wholeheartedly. It makes me think about that movie Rounders when Damon’s character is talking about taking the legs out from under his opponent and then just having to lean on them the rest of the night. We could have got on em early and it would have been good night Irene!
I truly enjoy reading all the post from this site and hate that I had not found you guys sooner. I really appreciate the in depth analysis and attention to detail that each post presents.
That’s a cool thing to say man. Appreciate you.
Thanks so much Rashad. We really appreciate you stopping by, and thank you for the kind words!
I cant believe it took stoops to point out to the refs on the screens in the red zone. Speaking of tight ends…I wonder how taylor mcnamara is progressing? I know he was highly regarded in high school. I have only seen him play in the spring game and he was flexed out looking decent and I know his blocking needed improvement and that was spring 2012 when he was an Early Enrollment. I heard he had some type of surgery a while back… I don’t know if you guys know anything about him? Or if you believe the tight ends still aren’t ready to perform at a high level?
Someone needs to do something about Baylor’s “picks”. Seriously. Coaches teach players how to pick so that it doesn’t look like a pick which means there is a limit to how much it can screen a defender. Those guys didn’t even look they were running routes!
The problem is McNamara was a Deandre Goolsby-type TE in HS. Those guys get graded high by the corporate recruiting services because when they attend camps they have them workout with the TEs so they look amazing as receiving threats. But they aren’t true TEs so we compare them to big WRs. That’s why Goolsby didn’t get a good grade from most of us. It isn’t to say that Goolsby and McNamara can’t turn into good blockers but it isn’t something they excelled at. But as a HS receiving threat I was personally more impressed with McNamara. But the real TE is Carson Meier.
Awesome, thanks Super K.
quick question here: watching some games from last year specifically Texas last year when Bell would come in, he looks like a completely different runner ALL year, but most profound difference is UT last year. Looking at him this year he looks indecisive and ridiculous out there trying to run a lot of the time…you guys have any insight as to what has changed from year to year? by all accounts blocking is better all around, but he looks very fidgety back there and hesitant which makes me think it’s a head thing…what can we do as the coaching staff to help correct that? the play i have specifically in mind for UT last year is the run to the corner pylon and he looks like a train off the track wreckign through defenses and this year he’s got no juice whatsoever…
This is good stuff. On #7 and #7 cont. I am trying to recall what the pass play was, but I don’t remember. Because I don’t recall what it was I’ll just make draw up a play in my head, assuming it will work.
This looks like a stick concept to me. The difficult part is to get the ball away quickly. Also, Baylor is playing man-to-man. However, the space vacated by sending the house is huge, especially to the boundary side. If OU’s WRs could beat their man one-on-one I think this would have been a huge gain or score.
Bester, at the bottom, has acres of space to go inside with a slant or post or outside with a vertical. Beat his man by a step and he’s got it. Whoever is at the top beats his man with a by a step with a veritcal route and he’s got it. The two slot receivers can run the slant/flat combination, beat their main one-on-one and they’ve got it.
So, this all sounds like it would work easily. Yet, here’s my issue with OU’s offense. I am not convinced the WRs can beat DBs one-on-one consistently. They’re smallish, slot WRs who are going up against DBs who are equally as fast and big as they are. If I saw this formation and all-out blitz for OU’s defense I’d starting thinking “oh, ****.” One mistake by the DB and it bad news.
I hope, in the future, our big WRs OU is getting will solve some of this problem. OU has to get better match-ups in our favor.
Yeah, the play ended up being a little in route to bester that came up 5 yds short or so. Going cover zero here, it’d be a good time to send clay up in the line and shoot him out over the middle for a quick hitter. He’d be uncovered, and you don’t have enough to block everyone anyway.
This is AWESOME! Absolutely love this site. Thanks for what you do.
Ne’erdowell I couldn’t agree more that other than Sanders I don’t think our guys get open very much.
I feel like as a guy who played the game I somewhat get the game, and it has seemed that our schemes have not been very sound all year. This article just confirms it. The job of our staff is to put guys in a position to make plays, and that isn’t really happening. So when we do put them in good position and a guy doesn’t make a play, which is going to happen, then it is catastrophic. These posts should be filled with guys making bad decisions not filled with poor schemes and asking our guys to make plays in situations that are not likely to happen.
Thanks again for the site.
Good insight Daryl…really good insight.
seconded
These breakdowns are awesome. However, you might want to limit them through the rest of this season just to hopefully save some sanity from Sooner fans! Excellent info.
lol – well you’ll notice we didn’t do the 2nd half – I think it was too painful for JY to watch 🙂
Thanks Dub! I’ll get the Iowa State game up quicker this next week. A lot of stuff going on for me this week. Thank you!
Hey guys. Just got referred here and I gotta tell you I am extremely impressed with everything I have read thus far. I was just so insanely upset with this game and its play calling. People kept saying,oh god Blake sucks, get him out of there. But I saw so many times he would see we didn’t have numbers for the run play that was called, he would look to the sideline and they stuck with whatever play was called. The I formation needs to be implemented more for sure. The play calling was atrocious and I felt that JH’s news conference attempted to lay most of the blame on the players. I feel our coaches never gave our players a chance on offense and our defense played their hearts out. Really heart breaking game. Hopefully changes are made and our scheming will get better….it only has one way to go at this point. BoomSoon!
Yeah, changes have to be made. Sometimes it feels like I’m watching the history channel. You know when you’re watching re-enactments of the old civil war and revolutionary war battles? Frontal assault into a hail of cannon fire. Hmm…seems like a good idea.
Seriously though, thanks so much for checking us out! Let us know if you have any questions!