Thoughts on the Defense

Image via Soonersports.com

I was out of town over the weekend so I didn’t get a chance to watch the spring game. I finally managed to watch some of it late last night. I wanted to highlight a few things I noted about the defense.

Firstly, as coach Stoops mentioned in his post spring game presser, the personnel on the two deep will be very different come fall than it is right now. I know there are some concerned about the depth. OU obviously doesn’t have the depth they’d like. But I really wouldn’t sweat that at the moment. If you had a chance to see the 2nd team’s that some major programs in the country are fielding right now…it’s similar…if not worse. You’ll just have to take my word on that. What I really wanted to look at what was the overall defensive alignment and techniques, particularly in the secondary.

I came away impressed.

Defensive Line: Most of you probably noted that while OU did run some of their odd front alignment, for the most part they ran an even front alignment. I’ve been calling it a 4 man front throughout the spring because I name it based on alignment and assignment as opposed to personnel. Bottom line is, whatever you call it, it’s a single gap under front alignment similar to what the Stoops brothers always ran. I think it’s preferable because:

1) From this alignment OU will be able to attack the gaps up front and hopefully we will see a more aggressive front on the edges and inside.

2) This is a front that the Stoops brothers have always taught and know like the back of their hands.

3) It allows OU to be multiple in their fronts. They can run both their odd and even front alignments. One of the reasons I like this is because it not only allows you to play to the weakness of the offense, down and distance or alignment but it also allows the defensive line to attack from a different departure point. In other words, shifting a technique means that even if the offensive linemen is expected to block the same defender, he’s being attacked with a slightly different degree of quickness and a slightly different angle just based on the alignment.

4) It doesn’t put as much pressure on the nose guard, as he doesn’t have to man both A gaps. It also keeps one of the linebackers covered so any lack of physicality can be somewhat masked.

From a personnel stand point, I didn’t come away super impressed with the way the defensive line played. But again, there is so little depth right now. I did expect to see a little more out of certain guys but I don’t think it’s anything to worry about at the moment.

Linebackers: The two single biggest things I came away with from the linebacker core was:

1) Playing through the zone! Last year Oklahoma’s linebackers allowed receivers to run through zones without pattern matching. In the spring game you could tell there had been an emphasis on playing your man through the zone and recognizing the possible route combinations as the play develops. At one point I saw a linebacker play through the zone so much that he actually took himself too far and wasn’t able to sustain leverage against the run. While that may sound like a bad thing. It’s going to be corrected. I’m just glad to see that matching through the zone is an emphasis.

2) Reacting quicker. Great linebackers, know what’s coming before it comes. They aren’t don’t appear to be reading. They’re reacting. The thing that I’d like to see corrected was at times we were seeing some guys react immediately and then try to break down as opposed to flying down hill and hitting the offensive player or striking the opposing blocker with bad intentions to spill the play or whatever the assignment requires. What I mean by this, if, for example, I want to force a runner back inside and I see a blocker, I’m going to attack the blockers outside shoulder. I can do that by breaking down and trying to force the play back inside with some deliberation or, assuming I recognize the play, I can make that blocker never want to block me again.

In general I like the way Oklahoma is aligning their LBs in a way to keep guys available in the run game but also giving them pass coverage assignments. It’ll put pressure on the OLB/nickel but it’ll be worth it when OU is able to better squeeze the spread looks in both the run and the pass.

Secondary: I love love love what coach Kerry Cooks and the defensive staff have done here. Here is why:

1) Cornerback technique and alignment has significantly changed. The cornerbacks have freedom to play press or off. And you’ll note that many of them opt for a press technique. It all starts with the stance. It’s obvious that coach Cooks started from the very beginning with these guys. They all begin the play with a respectable and consistent stance that displays a clear defensive back mannerism. Just looking at those boys in their stance indicated right away that they are being taught details.

We saw some guys hard press, we saw others use a motor mirror or inch back technique where they play square to the receiver and just stay in front of him giving a few steps at the snap. Guys were transitioning well, were cleaner in the backpedal, were stabbing, etc. They looked like real deal cornerbacks. Obviously once the freshman get in, it’s going to be about finding the hardest working and most talented athletes to put on the field at that position. But it’s nice to know that if the corners are going to get beat this year, they’ll get beat because they were just outclassed and not because they weren’t given the tools or put in the position to succeed.

2) The overall secondary alignment reminded me a lot of Michigan State’s alignment. Particularly, because the safety alignments were so tight. I don’t recall seeing Oklahoma stagger their safeties or play two high safeties that low. I love it personally. It’s clear though why coach Cooks has placed such an emphasis on speed in his recruiting. When the alignment is that aggressive it can really suffocate a defense because you’re able to keep two high safeties and either rotate to a cover 3/cover 1 or stay in your quarters coverage/2 man under and have better leverage against the run. The downside of that alignment is that you don’t have the same cushion against receiver threats. I personally don’t care though. I think you’ve got to play that aggressive alignment, squeeze the offense and if it doesn’t work just keep recruiting guys that can play that way until the formula does work. In my estimation, it’s proven that it’s the best way to play against the various spread and pro attacks.

Conclusion: I came away very pleased with what I saw and with a renewed sense of respect for the defensive staff. I like what I see Oklahoma doing. Now it’s just a matter of getting the excellent freshman class in, getting guys healthy, and getting some healthy competition going so that Oklahoma has the best possible athletes/football players at each position. I’m quite confident that just based on the way they are running the defense now, it’ll be better than last year. But I think more importantly, they’ve hopefully found a formula they can believe in and they can recruit the right athletes to.

141 Comments

  • TheFuerte says:

    Of the freshmen coming this summer; P.J., Haughton, Sunderland, MCkinney, who do you think is most prepared to see the field based on hs film?

    • OU_Sooners says:

      Mbanasor will definitely see the field. Also feel like 2 of the 3 safeties will see time as well. Not necessarily starting, but field time nonetheless.

    • Super K says:

      They have different strengths but to me if you can reach a physical threshold then it’s about learning your assignments and being disciplined. From that perspective I’d say PJ and Haughton because of their football IQs. Haughton played in a fairly complex defense and made the calls.

      • Boom says:

        Haughton is so smooth he doesn’t even look like he’s running hard. Glides around the backfield and had a pop for a 175 pound kid.
        Really interested in DL – Mann, Gabriel, & Gallimore

  • CcrBoomer says:

    I would have to go with MCkinney and P.J. that would have the best shot this year out of those 4

    • Super K says:

      McKinney has potential to be a real stud. Only thing that concerns me is, he was known as a bit of “free styler” at SOC which got him in trouble at times. If he can learn the defense and has the discipline to play in it, he’s got great potential. Just not sure if it’ll be this year.

  • Jason Vos says:

    If PJ Mbanasor is a good as advertised then he should be able to take over the Nickel spot, allowing Stephen Parker to move back to one of the high safety spots.

    • Super K says:

      Not sure that would be the best thing given the run assignments. Parker breaks quickly in the run game which I like. I’m wondering if Kahlil maybe come in and push Thomas or Byrd.

      • SoonerfanTU says:

        Hope so. I’ve been very disappointed in both, especially Byrd.

        • Super K says:

          Byrd is playing strictly free safety so he’s got the athleticism. What he doesn’t have right now is the eyes. He’s got tunnel vision. A lot like Texas’ safety Jason Hall.

  • Jason Vos says:

    I don’t know why, but something about Dwayne Orso caught my attention. He is big and well put together, and with some playing time could be a player that can make some impact.

    • hemisooner says:

      been telling people that since the fall.

    • lulzer says:

      Somebody said this earlier. Orso will be a beast this year.

    • JD says:

      His physique reminds me of Phillips…but without the back flips…he should be able to make plays if he’s turnt lose…I really like to see the D line attack

    • Super K says:

      Dwayne flashed. He plays high and at times it really hurt him. But there were also flashes of greatness that I remember seeing in HS where he is able to use his long arms and really manipulate the player in front of him with ease. Jury is still out for me but I’m gonna bet he ends up being a player before it’s all said and done.

      • hemisooner says:

        what I was told, he is physically all that you want. Does he play high yes but with coaching and experience you can correct that. What I like is his reach and strong hands.

  • Randy says:

    I worry about the skill set (talent level) on the DL. That is he only position I see where we are not on par with the top 4 of last year.

    • Boom says:

      Based on the past two years of recruiting, we have a different type of DL talent. I’m excited about this group with Orso, Dimon, DJ, Wade, Romar, Walker, Tapper, and the incoming guys, Gallimore, Mann, & Gabriel. Lots of guys who will provide good depth

      • hOUligan says:

        Definitley seeing a upgrade at DL. Will miss Phillips in the middle at times, no doubt, but Romar is really built to play NG/A-gap at 6’ish and 300#. Worry about the depth behind him which might force Overton or Gallimore into service. With Tapper and Walker running 4.7-4.8 40s in winter workouts, got to start cutting those guys loose to attack. But Monty did well getting some great DE talent signed. Just have to get them coached up. Hoping Dimon is back.

      • EasTex says:

        I looked at Mann’s tape again a few days ago. I think he will be a pleasant surprise for Sooner fans.

  • Jason Vos says:

    Hey K, did Joseph Paul play in the spring game? Or is he injured, didn’t notice him at all on sat

  • Randy says:

    He is the one I hope we are missing.. Didn’t see a lot of difference makers on the DL.

    • Jason Vos says:

      Maybe the Oline is better than people think

    • Super K says:

      It’s going to be a tough sledding when you’re missing guys like Walker, Romar and Dimon (I don’t recall seeing Walker or Romar). Those guys are betters than everyone on the DL with the exception of Tap. I saw Ijalana out there at DE and he’s no where close to being a big 12 DE at the moment. When they are full strength it’ll be much better than what we saw last weekend.

      • Sooner 76 says:

        Walker didn’t play b/c of strep throat. Romar played.

      • Randy says:

        Still missing a difference maker, Walker and Orso seem like the best of the bunch. Tapper I thought was it 2 yrs ago, needs to have a BIG senior year for us to be good up front.

  • Sooner Ray says:

    I also think this defense is going to appear much improved this fall….even though that’s not a big hurdle to jump.

  • John McCroskey says:

    D-Line – Worse
    O-Line – Worse
    LB – Same
    DB – Better
    QB – Same, but with this gimmick offense you can grab a guy off the street to throw for 5,000 yards.
    WR – Better
    RB – Deeper, I guess, but will not be utilized at 100% efficiency/efficacy.

    Just based off the lines being worse, OU football is looking at the same record as last year with a harder schedule.

    • soonerthunder says:

      Not sure we can tell much about the DL or OL from Saturday, and September will tell us if you are right about LBs. I don’t agree about a gimmick offense. Oregon seems to do well (not same offense, but many are duplicating and having success). But I do think it makes it easier on the QB. Much easier choices to make to be successful.

    • JD says:

      OLine -same
      Dline -better by technique alone
      Backers-way better than last year
      Dbf-Better simply by maturation and scheme tweak
      QB -push but offensive plays will make them better than last year
      Wr-yes
      Wr yes

    • SoonerfanTU says:

      Well aren’t you just a ray of sunshine?

    • boomersooner says:

      dline-wrong
      oline-will be hard for most lines to be better than last yrs
      lb-wrong
      db-right
      qb-wrong
      wr-right
      rb-sorta right/sorta wrong

      if this is troll job, its not very good. if this is your take, i guess you will be pleased with what happens or you will just continue to wallow in yourself

      • John McCroskey says:

        Your post boils down to “NUH UH!” How about giving some logical explanations behind your sunshine pumping?

        OU has lost a first rounder at D-Tackle, and has lost a couple of guys (Garnett, Walker, Romar etc) to injury. The D-Line will be less talented.

        O-Line has lost 3 NFL’ers and a 5th year center and about 300lbs of cumulative weight. The saving grace is the air raid gets the ball out quickly. But don’t expect to have a lot of yards rushing from scrimmage.

        LB – Mike and Kish are coaching them. ’nuff said.

        DB – I know I’m right, thanks.

        QB – The QB’s didn’t magically gain talent the last 3 months. This offense let’s a noodle armed couch potato throw for 5,000 yards. See Cumbie, Hodges, Symons, Kingsbury ad nauseam.

        WR – I know I’m right, thanks.

        RB – I made a logical deduction with facts to back it up. You might try it sometime.

        Come stronger than that.

    • Jeff says:

      If that happens OU could be looking for a new head coach

    • Fear The Magic says:

      DEFINITELY disagree with you on the LBs big time. I dont think you thought that one out very well. The only LB we lose was Grissom who in my opinion was a DE anyway.
      to call the rest of the group “Same” I dont even fathom
      J. Evans – more experienced
      Striker – more experienced
      Bond- more experienced and very improved
      Alexander- more experienced
      Shannon- back and that alone would make the LB position better than last year
      Bolton- very good potential …didnt play last year
      T Evans – excellent potential
      McGinnis – Freshman Big potential
      DeBester – Freshman Big potential.

      Bottom line we’re MUCH deeper at LB and much more experienced

      How in the world can you put “same”?

      • John McCroskey says:

        I just don’t hold out any hope for that position anymore. It seems like, maybe, every 5 years we have a legit linebacker back there like Lofton. And now MasterBlaster, I mean, Mike and Kish, are heading up that position. I also could’ve gone with Krang.

    • D Hunter Sanchez says:

      Gimmick offense? Like the one that set a record for collegiate football or like Brady runs at times in the league? Was the Houston-Veer a gimmick? How about the Wishbone? How about the Read? Kind of a lame comment when the fact of the matter is that any offense used in college can be classified as “gimmicky.” But since the NFL copies college ball, why is gimmicky a negative attribute?

    • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

      Oh, I love this guy/girl. I have a stick and I know who I’m going to poke with it over and over.

    • ccmosaic says:

      This is a funny post. You have a sense of humor.

  • soonerthunder says:

    Thank you!! That was an excellent, unemotional breakdown of the D. I also like what you said about depth. Ridiculous to criticize depth in a spring game, like you said. Last yr’s seniors, injuries, people you could play but won’t for many reasons, no incoming FR yet, players in blue jerseys, etc. That’s another reason not to criticize any player, even a walkon, who plays at OU. They have an important role even if fans/media don’t see it.

    Spring games are for the fans, mainly. It’s a glorified 7 on 7 scrimmage. Important to look at lining up correctly for the linemen, mainly. DL can’t go full out. OL not seeing full out rush. But still it’s important, to learn where to line up on both sides. On the rest: with fans watching and on TV, the O only runs about 8 plays, the D has seen them many times. But still important for the LBs/DBs to learn to line up correctly, etc, and the O to learn the basic O plays. W/o fans/TV the O would have run many more plays, IMO. It’s things you talked about that were most important, not the scoring/lack of or much of what many fans/media concern themselves with.

  • Stephen Dale says:

    a couple of thoughts after reading the article : 1.) the offense was playing without several contributors and 2.) the defense knew the offensive playbook….those two facts makes any evaluation of the defense—or offense for that matter– difficult…Who really knows how good the squad can be in the Fall ?? The effectiveness of the OU offense may be directly proportional to the ineffectiveness of the defense and vice versa….How good are the athletes on either side of the ball ?? as a layman watching the game , I can’t evaluate what I witnessed cause everything was scripted …..

    • Super K says:

      The defense played without contributors as well. I don’t recall seeing Romar or Walker. Romar, in my opinion is definitively better than Wade. Wade just doesn’t have enough explosion right now to get the OL on his heels or to deliver a good punch.

      • Sooner 76 says:

        Romar played. Romar, Wade and Frasier played the NG position.

      • EasTex says:

        Romar did indeed play. In the second half the red team had its back close to the end zone. On one play Romar totally destroyed Alvarez with his speed and strength.

    • thill says:

      He wasn’t analyzing results. He was analyzing alignments, techniques, principles, etc. And he did it well.
      I believe the site is glad you said you cant evaluate what you witnessed because, well, you cant and are not qualified to evaluate anything…….

      • SamSooner says:

        Why does he-who-must-not-be-named bother to come here? He’d be better off just flipping to become a horn fan. If he did, his negative comments would make sense.

    • ccmosaic says:

      Agree but you can judge alignments and technique as well as speed and hands. The DB’s are playing far more press and as K said even their stance is different. I think what K is saying is that they showed that changes were made and good ones at that.

  • Soonerfandave84 says:

    Still think the long term answer at FS isn’t on campus yet, Steven Parker still has a ways to go before he’s really THE guy at SS, but you can see the skill is there. Behind Sanchez and J. Thomas there is no depth at CB…C’mon on PJ Mbanasor!!! Also, K do you think seeing what we saw Saturday that Neville Gallimore is a starting DT/DE by seasons end?(I do)

    • JD says:

      Will Johnson looks pretty good at cb..glad we have him for 3 years instead of two

      • Soonerfandave84 says:

        He has some skill but I thought he looked a bit stiff

        • JD says:

          He’s our third best guy right now and played some good technique…maybe not perfect but he’ll make plays for us…he’s a lot better than Dakota and Taylor didn’t play…like to see how he’s improving

          • Soonerfandave84 says:

            Agreed, he reminded me a lot of Julian. Best role would be a nickel

          • JD says:

            Yeah he’s a nickel too…if the back end isn’t working right he could start at nick and allow Parker to fall back if necessary

          • Soonerfandave84 says:

            Yeah that sounds pretty solid

          • ccmosaic says:

            You have got to be kidding me. Julian could not press!!!! Will Johnson looked very good on his press. Your looking for the bad bro.

        • ccmosaic says:

          What? Your kidding right? Kid was fluid and quick and he had a really good press technique. Your looking for the bad bro.

    • Soonerfandave84 says:

      Oh and thanks…Good read

  • SamSooner says:

    Super K, this was a very good read. Thanks for taking the time to put together this analysis. What you’ve written validates what I saw but I was not quite sure of what I was seeing. Having your expertise really brought it all together for me.

    This was an excellent write up. I happen to think the team will be better than projected. I’m calling for a National Title push this year.

    • Super K says:

      Funny thing is, before I watched the game I had read some reporters comments and it made me think the defensive future was horrible and the qb play was atrocious. I saw it different personally. I like the foundation of the defense and I think the QBs are going to be fine.

      • JD says:

        Buddy, you know better than let reporters influence your thinking!

        • Super K says:

          haha indeed. I just assumed since so many said the same thing, once I cut it on that’s what I was going to see. But I was pleasantly surprised.

          • JD says:

            A lot of good to see out there…get the right personnel together and we will be fine once the season starts…the puzzle isn’t far off imo

          • ccmosaic says:

            I think so many people are burned from last year that they expect to see horror and therefore that is what they see. Kind of like beer goggles.

      • SamSooner says:

        You’re correct in your thought process. One day the defense will play fast. That will be a bad day for any opposing offense.

        You said one more thing I like: “I think you’ve got to play that aggressive alignment, squeeze the offense and if it doesn’t work just keep recruiting guys that can play that way until the formula does work.”

        That line of thinking is the way successful people think.

      • soonermusic says:

        ” I like the foundation of the defense and I think the QBs are going to be fine.” I agree with your assessment.

        Excellent article. I very much appreciate your analysis of the scheme’s and comments on defensive technique–by that I mean the actual playing technique in addition to the alignment type. Very well done, K… Thanks.

  • Exiled In Ohio says:

    K, down below you said Wade isn’t explosive enough to be a force on the DL. What happened with him? He was pretty serviceable two years ago. Is it injuries or attitude or did he just plateau?

    • Boom says:

      To me, Romar is just better than Wade. If they are going to more of a gap alignment, Romar will be more of a force with his quickness. The good thing is there’s competition and will continue to push both of these guys.

    • Super K says:

      I just meant that at the moment he doesn’t appear to be playing with enough explosion in his first step or in the way he snaps/rolls his hips and fires out his hands to really jar the OL or get him on his heels against the pass. I didn’t mean to imply he can’t be a force. It was just an isolated observation about what I saw in the spring game. Kid was really explosive in HS so it’s there…he’s just got to find it through whatever workout regimens and repetitions necessary.

    • JD says:

      Wade got some nice pressure on TK in the 3rd…even asking for a sack but TK flushed right and almost got a first down

  • Robertson / Robertson 2016 says:

    I want Gallimore in Norman rat meow!

  • Sooner 76 says:

    K, I noticed, when in the 4-man front, that sometimes it was aligned to the offense’s strong side and sometimes to the offense’s weak side. What determines in which direction they align? It was clear that Striker wasn’t playing as a Jack LBer, but as a standup DE when in the 4-man front.

    When they were in front with 3 down linemen, it seemed to be more of a 5-2 (Oklahoma) front, as both outsider LBers were on the LOS (Shades of Steve Zable rushing the passer!). Comment?

    • JD says:

      You might post the link to that thread

    • Super K says:

      In the under front the 3 tech is aligned away from the strength of the offense. I’d have to go back and look but in their 50 front I believe it was a hybrid type front with a 2i nose and a 3 tech to the weakside but don’t quote me because I’ll need to go back and look closer. And yes the participation list would be awesome. I can add it to this post. Thanks!

  • Cush Creekmont says:

    Thanks for a well thought out analysis. Having watched the silly “game” twice, I will have to watch with crib notes from your review. I did notice some more aggressive DB play, but put that in the “did it in spring, but never to be seen in fall” jar along with the shovel passes (and in past years, passes to tight ends). Now, the LB coverage showed even to a novice like myself. The tipped pass interception was a very deep LB drop that seemed “new” compared to last year.

    So, thanks, but now I have to watch again to see what I overlooked. After I do that, I’m going to watch the 13 ND win and see how the D played there and the 14 saxet game and compare it too. But, what the heck, I’ve got months to “review.”

    • ToatsMcGoats says:

      From what I remember, the DB’s were the weakness of that ND team. Not to say that they weren’t coached well, they just weren’t that great. We pretty much did what we wanted against their DB’s.

  • John Garner says:

    Great analysis. We get some push from the D-Line, we might be pretty good. Thanx!

  • D Hunter Sanchez says:

    K love the breakdown! On the D line…we have to take into consideration the effect the opposing QB having a blue shirt on does to a d line. The only pressure I saw was from Bond. But this could be due to the fact that the D line couldn’t “touch” the QB. In addition, Charles Walker was not in there.

    • JD says:

      I saw Bond and Striker blitz from both edges..I think it was against Cody..I think he had to throw it away….Bond did also force TK out of the pocket where he threw his pick as well…good point on the line not being aggressive because of the jersey…Bendenbaugh has the Oline playing pretty good for such a fresh group of guys also

      • D Hunter Sanchez says:

        I missed the double edge attack. Great point! That needs to be used often with press coverage especially against Baylor with their quick throws. I was impressed by the OL as well. Do you agree that Farniok is a backup?

        • JD says:

          I’m believe St John and either Brown or Frison will be the starters but we might have a solid group to rotate…Farniok is better in run blocking imo but I’ve heard his footwork has improved so I’m sure there’s a chance he could make some noise

          • EasTex says:

            I was impressed with how much Farniok has improved. Not just his run blocking, but he handled a charging Tapper in pass pro quite nicely.

          • JD says:

            Yeah he’s improved…looks like he’s just in front of Frison…he made some mistakes out there a few times…let Striker push him back on a run play and Strike grabbed Ross for minimal gain.. We might use a rotation to keep the guys fresh so nice to see the 2s pushing

          • EasTex says:

            Striker’s quickness has given many a good OT trouble the past few years.
            I also saw Striker get swallowed alive by Farniok and just gave up trying to get past him.

        • JD says:

          Just looked again…they had Brown behind StJohn at LT and Frison behind Farniok at RT…D had a rotation w Strike and Bond on the field at the same time…one or the other usually backed off for contain or coverage but there will be plenty of times we’ll surely see both blitz both will cause problems in the back field during passing downs…Bond doesn’t look as good in coverage

  • Slim Sooner says:

    Thanks for this, K. I’m watching a replay of the game right now. Was just a little hungry to see the team, coaches and fans in the stadium, so not going to blast the game as worthless like some have. Appreciate posts like yours and all the Brainiacs during long off season.

  • JD says:

    Was Cody mainly going against the 1s…seems like it…I’m liking his progress

  • oumike23 says:

    Awesome insight! Thanks K. Now, would love some insight on Offense from you, too.

  • EasTex says:

    Thanks for the info, SK. Your analysis of the schemes helps me, as I tend to look at individual match-ups more.
    I have to say I was thoroughly impressed with Will Johnson. His coverage was excellent and he came up in run support and took Ross’ legs out from under him for a loss.
    The announcers said Johnson was the #2 CB in JUCO last year. Is there an actual rating service for JUCOs?

  • Sooner Ray says:

    I think the spring game is now on youtube for anyone who hasn’t seen it yet.

  • Doobie74OU says:

    I was just wondering when the last time we got to read a article about OU’s defense with so many positive things to look forward too! Great Article K! I too haven’t got to see the Spring game (remodeled my Mom’s Kitchen all weekend) but I am looking forward to watching the dvr this evening!

  • EasTex says:


    Saw a tweet from one Mecole Hardman Jr. that he was offered today, but can’t find another source.
    http://www.hudl.com/athlete/1626590/highlights/232066375/v2

  • ccmosaic says:

    Excellent post. I really appreciate your voice. All last weekend I heard how bad the D looked, but when I watched the game I came away very happy with the D. I agree on the D line, thought they could have played a little harder. I was impressed with the LBs and I thought the secondary looked like a different team. Yes the safety position was caught a couple times out of position but not like last year.

  • OUknowitscomin says:

    Great post as usual K, thanks!
    On a more important note :), I just got done ordering 4 Boom Soon Shirts for family of 3.
    We’ll either be Boom. Soon. Boom. or switch it up to Boom. Boom. Boom. Thought that also had a nice recruiting ring to it. Everyone wanted Boom. So I ordered 1 extra Soon for me or wife. Thought you bring us enough, I can certainly splurge to contribute back. Thank you.

  • Indy_sooner says:

    Waited for this, DB is my favorite position. Hope to see the one in the Fall with all the young-ins challenging for spots

  • JB says:

    K, what worries me is that Mike will be content to let the 4 down linemen take care of rushing the QB and leave LBs, safeties and CBs in coverage most of the time. I hope I’m wrong about that and he’s planning on utilizing an extra rusher or 2 on most plays…attack from a different angle on almost every play so that the QB is thoroughly out of sync and scared of getting hit. I want to see us attack a lot more than read & react. That, in my humble opinion, is what it takes to counter Big 12 offenses (or any other, for that matter). It’s a sound strategy that served the ’85 Bears and the 2002 Baltimore Ravens and Dick LeBeau’s Pittsburgh Steelers defenses. As Buddy Ryan himself once said, “To stop a passing game, you can’t stop it unless you put pressure on it…we’re not going to let you sit back there and pick us apart all day”.

    It seems of late Mike’s antidote is to take another LB off the field, put a safety on the field in his place hoping somehow these DBs will be able to magically keep receivers from getting open after 5+ seconds. I need to see more before I’m convinced.

    • JD says:

      I seen a few blitzes saturday (Evans) and we were very vanilla…saw Striker and Bond on the field at the same time as well (which side will the pressure come from)…I’m hopeful that we will see a defense reminiscent of the sugar bowl defense..we had Striker rushing and safety blitzes along with an attacking front 4. Last year for some reason we moved away from that and we saw less pressure from the D line…Tapper looked nothing like the 13 Tapper…I think we will see a blend of 13 and 14…both D were good in separate categories so hopefully this brings it together

    • Sooner Ray says:

      My hope is that Mike is just there as a family fixture and the new defensive coaches will have enough stroke to tell him to F off and go sip his liquor in the booth while we shut down some O.

      • JD says:

        Now now… we all know that Bob is the DC…always has been…hopefully he has the right mixture of council and talent to put 13 and 14 together to something the resembles the 08 defense

    • EasTex says:

      True story, Buddy Ryan was my next door neighbor for one year. He came from Hugo to Marshall, Tx as an assistant coach. It was the early 60’s. Nice fella and Mrs. Ryan was a good old girl that could flat out cook a down home meal and wasn’t afraid of butter.

    • L'Carpetron Dookmarriot says:

      I would also like an attacking defense. This link is the defensive playbook from 2002 ( http://www.footballxos.com/download/defense/college-defense/2002-Oklahoma-Defense-Bob-Stoops.pdf ) when Mike and Brent were DCs. Field Rip Dogs and Field Slam Dogs are some examples of zone blitzes they might use, probably still do.

      An attacking defense could mean that we have a “controlled chaos” defense (ala SmartFootball and LeBeau). http://grantland.com/features/dick-lebeau-evolution-coverage-tactics-zone-blitz/

  • Davey says:

    Outstanding read Super K. Thanks!!

  • WilliamJack says:

    Is this a GREAT site or what?!! Thanks Super K for the info and education!

  • WilliamJack says:

    It was great to see the Shovel pass again! Let’s hope it isn’t for the Spring game only.