Sooners News Daily 8.12.14

Man, so sad, RIP Robin Williams

FOOTBALL

The Frank Shannon situation got even messier yesterday after the official statement OU released as the university is now asking the state Supreme Court to step in. (NewsOK)

La Tech game is now a sellout, which means the only OU home game yet to do so is vs. Kansas. (Twitter)

Former Sooners OL, Trent Williams, benching close to 500 lbs. (if I counted the plates on each side right)

BASKETBALL

ESPN is buying OU b-ball this coming season as the Sooners could have as many as four Big Monday games. (Twitter)

OTHER

Um, no.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z0VAmb4uVI

Kind of surprised kid actually kept it together, respect.

Further evidence this is the greatest show of all time and spans all generations.

 

54 Comments

  • Sooner Ray says:

    Anyone catch the cowboy caravan in Tulsa last night? I forgot all about it, damn. 🙂

  • Dana Rogers says:

    Man, you said it. God speed, Robin.

  • Brian says:

    Is that 4 or 5 plates on that bar for Trent?

  • lovethemsooners says:

    Someone help me here. The DA chose not to prosecute Shannon, but the University is choosing to suspend him anyway? Can someone explain that so that those of us that don’t hold law degrees can understand?

    • Jed says:

      The DA handles criminal stuff (which is also local). The University is acting in line with Title IX, a Federal regulatory statute with roots in the Federal Constitution. Think of it in terms of getting acquitted of a crime….but still being liable for civil penalties.

      • paganpink says:

        It isn’t quite the same but I can’t help but note that many laws such as sexual harassment regulations specifically exempt members of Congress and the President from the rules that they hold the rest of us to. Hostile workplace indeed!

        • red clay says:

          “Due process” – done over and over and over and over and over until some meddler finds some rule some place in order to tear their pound of flesh.
          Sounds like double jeopardy, just by another method.
          Smell test – failed.

      • lovethemsooners says:

        Thanks Jed. So in other words, OU is just covering their own backside in regards to the Federal statute.

        I do hope this has been explained to the players on the team(and future recruits), so that they don’t think that the University doesn’t support them. I am curious though why the committee came down with such a harsh punishment, even though Shannon was never charged, and the woman in this incident changed her story.

        • Jed says:

          If OU doesn’t comply, they risk all Federal funding. At the end of the day, the University would continue without football. Without Federal money? Not so much.
          Regulations like this are crafted to be blunt hammers. They are put in place when big sections of the citizenry insist on abusing their fellows and won’t take more gentle hints.

        • leatherneck1061 says:

          “So in other words, OU is just covering their own backside in regards to the Federal statute.”

          Bingo!

      • paganpink says:

        It has NO roots in the constitution which states that all people are the same under the law. It does not state that some are a little more special then others….

        • Jed says:

          Look I’m not going to get sucked into one of these jeremiads. Go look up Title IX yourself. The line of precedent cited is clear. You can disagree with the SCOTUS all you want, but until you get that very same court to agree with you, the law of the land stands.
          The concept of protected classes is well established.
          And my point was confined to distinguishing between State and Federal jurisdiction. Criminal matters are mostly state and compliance with a Federal Reg is most certainly Federal. That, at its most basic, is why a DA’s decision not to prosecute is not dispositive to the regulatory action.

    • cpearc00 says:

      Yeah, what Jed said. Also, in order for a DA to file criminal charges, he/she will have to determine whether they can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime. I’m sure the standard is much lower for the university. Not to mention the rules of evidence are likely much more lax in the administrative setting as opposed to the evidence code followed by state and federal courts.

      • paganpink says:

        And not to mention that Boren, and virtually the entire faculty aside from the business school professors, are liberal Democrats, so when an allegation goes before the hearing panel, then the faculty and staff, followed by the final appeal to the chief student affairs officer (a member of the faculty and staff) it is virtually the same people at every point along the way. In their defense, they are threatened by the NCAA and the Federal government and oftentimes punished for almost any allegation by a female against a male if no action is taken. This makes Universities run by leftist academics even more prone to punish male students or athletes even in cases where it is completely “he said- she said” and there is no other evidence, The regular students bulldozed by political correctness are simply not newsworthy so the public rarely hears about their punishments under the poorly written and deliberately female biased title IX laws. Many people know they are the source of men’s programs being cut across the nation but few know of the suspensions and expulsion judgments many male students are subjected to in this country.

        • Eric Hoffpauir says:

          Please leave politics off this site. Thanks.

        • Jed says:

          Social Conservatism offers helpful advice on this point: don’t have sex before marriage.
          Bazinga! Situation solved!

          Pagan, I don’t completely disagree with you, but you’re drawing your lines in Sharpie when they ought to be a fine point drafting tool.

          • paganpink says:

            What are you talking about?

          • Jed says:

            A foolproof way to avoid Title IX complaints.
            And, that I think that trying to tie supposed political bias on the part of the faculty or admin into this is a stretch. There’s enough there without politics to generate the action they’ve taken. Could you have gone less? Definitely. But what was done, apparently, is certainly within a logical realm without implying any political bias.

        • jmac45 says:

          Curious why the guy that always starts a political diatribe is usually ignorant of which he speaks. Please, just stop.

    • leatherneck1061 says:

      Think Duke Rape Case. All defendants were assumed guilty until it was proven their accuser was a pathological liar. That is the state of sexual politics in schools today. If you are the male, you are just guilty. End of story.

      • FeedtheMonster says:

        Unless you’re at Florida State, which was just as wrong the other way in my opinion.

  • D'Brickashaw Ferguson says:

    RIP Robin Williams. Goes to show that celebrities have their own demons just like we do.

    Thought I’d share a clip from “Mrs. Doubtfire,” one of my favorites from him:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAp8j4c2LGs

    • leatherneck1061 says:

      Truly heartbreaking. Sometimes comedians are more depressed than others, and their “funnyman” acts are a compensation for that. Jim Carrey seems to have been in the same boat at times. Just too sad.

  • BigJoeBrown says:

    Trent Williams….that is just insane. WOW
    Potential 4 Big Monday games….Lon Kruger has really made this program something to be proud of. As crazy as it sounds, yes I can’t wait for football season. But Kruger has me pumped for Sooner hoops.
    Saved By The Bell….now that was great TV.

    • ComancheJoe says:

      Mario Lopez was probably embarassed to film on those tumbling mats! He was a California High School state placer in 1991 @ 160lbs, 7th. Wrestled for Chula Vista H.S. out of the San Diego county section. That section went on to place 3 at his weight: 1st, 7th and 8th. He was a pretty legit folkstyle wrestler.

  • kt-raida says:

    5 TFB threads yesterday!!! I didn’t know what to do.

  • trusoonerA53 says:

    Greatness, what are they feeding him:-).

  • ToatsMcGoats says:

    Was just at my bank, spreading the good word of TFB, and I happened to reach a few lost souls. They say that they’ll definitely check out the site. I left smiling as they were reaching for their phones.

  • lovethemsooners says:

    I just have one last question in regards to the Shannon thing and I’ll leave it alone. I’m curious what the current players think. Do they feel like their school doesn’t support them, or do they for the most part understand why OU is doing this? If someone wants to give their take on how this could possibly effect our recruiting, that wouldn’t bother me either. Thanks in advance.

    • trebizond says:

      I’m sure they all feel differently. I understand everyone’s desire that the players feel supported, but I get tired of everyone assuming the University is out to get people (not saying you feel this way). This is a big problem across the country, and it’s a difficult issue. People need to be vigilant in not letting their football blinders affect their judgment. I’m not saying Frank is guilty or not guilty of anything, I haven’t been presented with all the information. However, if I were on the committee, I would do my best to ignore the fact that Frank is on the team. Obviously, for fans, this creates a stake in a situation in which they would otherwise have none, which in turn causes people to prefer a certain outcome. That preference colors their view of the situation and about what the University should or should not do, and can create some nasty commentary/accusations. It’s amazing, but not surprising, the strength of opinions on this issue considering how little we really know.

  • Drew says:

    Hey, I’ve been lurking since this spring, but this is my first time posting. Just wanted to say I love the site, and that I would happily pay for all the info you give out. Keep up the good work.

    Anyway, I just saw this article over on B/R that really is the epitome of journalistic impartiality that you all might enjoy (yes, that was sarcastic).

    Roll Tide -> http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2159193-debunking-the-myth-that-nick-saban-defenses-cant-stop-the-no-huddle

    • paganpink says:

      Thanks for the link Drew, and welcome! I did notice that Saban had an awfully long list of things they could do better at the end of that report LOL.

    • Jordan Esco says:

      Appreciate you reading and now commenting as well!

      • Drew says:

        It’s my pleasure. I’ve been watching OU football for as long as I can remember (specifically, the safety during the 2000 championship game. I was 6 at the time, and was very confused), but I understand what’s going on better than ever through this site. You’re doing an awesome job.

    • Cam says:

      The thing that no one mentions is that the excuse of playing a “consolation” game is indicative of either poor sportsmanship on the players part or poor coaching. If a coach can’t motivate their team to play 110% after a loss they aren’t worth a penny.

  • JrsySooner says:

    OK its after 7am where is my updATE??? I will have my update!!!!!
    Good grief this board is the new drug of choice