
Image via greenwichtime.com
For whatever reasons, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of talk about this OU bowl game versus Clemson. To me, however, there are a number of compelling aspects to this particular matchup. Of course, you have the Brent Venables angle of a guy facing a program he coached for previously for the better part of 11 years. And the way his tenure ended at OU could be deemed as somewhat controversial, no matter what either side says to the media.
Excluding that obvious storyline, however, I’d like to add some other things I’m looking forward to in this year’s edition of the Russell Athletic Bowl.
* OU’s offense vs. Clemson defense – Sure, this kind of goes under the whole ‘Venables vs. Stoops Bros.’ narrative, but when you start to look at the numbers, this is a pretty compelling storyline.
Clemson ranks No. 1 in the country in total defense, while Oklahoma ranks No. 19 in total offense and No. 10 in scoring offense. Which is actually kind of shocking when you consider the amount of pressure being thrown at Josh Heupel from many an OU fan. And those stats just scratch the surface of things.
Clemson ranks No. 6 in the country in rushing defense, only giving up a paltry 98 yards a game. In contrast, OU ranks No. 8 in rushing offense, averaging nearly 269 yards per game on the ground. Now, that said, I don’t think Clemson has faced an offensive line that run blocks as well as what they can expect to see from Oklahoma on Monday. Nor has Clemson faced a running back this year that is on the level of Samaje Perine.
* Obviously, I think OU can and will run the ball. However, in my mind the difference maker in this game will have to be Trevor Knight. Despite many thoughts to the contrary, if you go back and look at the numbers, I believe Knight has actually played pretty well this year.
The thing with Knight, like many on here have stated, is consistency. Or, more to the point, his lack of exactly that, at least at times. He’ll have a great stat line, but make that one HUGE mistake that potentially costs OU the game. It’s no excuse, but he is still just a redshirt sophomore. And it’s worth repeating, Knight is 11-3 as a starter at OU.
That seems lost on a lot of fans and, to some degree, I don’t blame them. Had he not thrown two costly interceptions against TCU and K-State, his record as a starter looks even better and fans aren’t clamoring for Baker Mayfield.
Having said all of that, the lingering question for me is how will OU use Knight after his injury scare against Baylor that forced him to miss the final three games. From what I’ve seen this year, OU has to have some sort of quarterback run game to help them to move the ball consistently. When OU runs the QB, they put up points.
But the obvious question is whether or not Knight can hold up? Maybe it’s his frame. Maybe he just needs to learn how to avoid, or when necessary absorb, hits better. Maybe it’s just plain ol’ bad luck. Maybe it’s some combination of all of the above. Regardless, through his first two years as a starter he clearly hasn’t been able to do what is necessary to stay healthy.
2015 is another conversation for another time. But as far as getting a win in this bowl game, a healthy Trevor Knight, who can make plays with his legs, is clearly the best option on the table. If he’s not able to make plays outside the pocket, however, it could be a long day.
Venables knows the tendencies of Josh Heupel and an OU offense. And the same applies for Heupel and a Venables led defense. On paper at least, the game seems to hinge on who wins this particular chess match. My biggest question is whether we see Sugar Bowl Josh Heupel or the Heupel we’ve seen at times struggle to establish and maintain a definitive offensive identity for this OU program.
When he establishes an identity early, any identity, and, most importantly, sticks to said identity, OU generally comes away with excellent offensive continuity and, as Bob Stoops likes to say, executes in a great way.
Let’s hope Sugar Bowl Josh Heupel made the trip down to Orlando.
21 Comments
Heuple doesn’t have the Sugar Bowl receivers and that’s been a big difference the entire season.
Very true. Quick has shown flashes. Heupel called a masterful game last year, though. His use of the screen game was the difference. He used Bama’s speed against them. Has to come up with something creative this time around, as well.
Agreed but I don’t know if he can do much with the down field passing attack. My bet is BV will smother Shep.
I agree with most all of what you said. I think comes down to whoever wins the OU Oline vs. Clemson Dline battle will most likely win the game (strengths of both teams). If we can run the ball it takes pressure off of TK9 and allows us to choose when to pass and the play action will create more separation for our WR’s. I think JH has been told to run the rock. I don’t believe they will run TK9 much. I could be wrong though. The coaches know they need TK9 to win the game since there really isn’t much of another option for an effective QB (at this point in their careers). I look for TK9 to move the pocket against a very active Dline. But running right at that Dline will keep them in place and help neutralize their athleticism.
Behold. The eyes of the man who swept Katy Perry off her feet.
All those years of following Brent at OU, middle of the field will be wide open, Blake will have a big game. If he doesn’t, then JH’s head needs to be examined.
I agree. The TE NEEDS to be the X factor. With our run game and Shep, the TE game will keep the Clemson D on their toes and can prevent V from calling a lot of creative blitzes for fear of being torched by Bell.
Please JH, use Bell and Rip and TMac!!!
A redshirt sophomore is still a junior. We have seen Ohio state go 3 deep on the QB depth chart why can’t we find one. We use to be the best at it.
Misleading. Since before the season started, the QB that played ONE good game against Wisconsin, has been the 2nd string guy.
They still had 3 serviceable QB’s
Using the Sugar Bowl as a benchmark, not only was the offensive game plan well designed it was executed to near perfection. The number of tough, competitive catches the receivers made in that game helped make TK look great. When OU needed some tough yards to make a first down, they got them and it didn’t matter if it was a screen or a run off tackle.
Too often this season there were dropped passes and getting stuffed on a one yard run for a first down.
I think Clemson has a good defense, but looking into their numbers and their opponents the lofty ranking in total defense just doesn’t impress me. I think we have already faced several defenses in our conference that are superior. It will be interesting to me to see if Venables still has the same issue with making real-time game adjustments as he used to.
Clemson’s offense appears severely outmatched by the Sooners defense and their special teams haven’t been very good.
I don’t know what to expect today from the OU coaches or the players, but I would dearly love to see them all fully engaged, focused and excited to play.
I’m interested in JH game plan. To me, his seat is warm and he needs to have a good game. I will be watching to see if the offense is efficient, has a rhythm, & not predictive.
On defense, my eyes will be on the DBs/LBs especially on play action. Also, will we play aggressive with team tackling.
Many times this year I thought the game plan was good, the execution was not. Other times the game plan had me scratching my head.
It seems blame always falls on the OC, even when the offense is setting records for scoring 60+ per game.
agree. I’m looking at JHs body of work since he’s been here and don’t think it’s that good. Like I’ve said all along, it’s Stoops who will make the decisions and i will back him.
I will support Bob’s decisions, too.
Every year it seems we lose guys crucial to our offense. 2011 we lost Dom Whaley and Broyles and we went down the tubes at the end of the season. This year was even worse, lost Ford for 7 games, Shep for 5(?), TK for 3. Oh for one year of good health through the entire season.
I would like to see OU get away from the “check the sideline” play changing scheme. Is the QB room full of guys who can’t read a defense? Let the QB check into a couple of plays a game without checking the sideline. JMO
IMHO, OU is going to need to both pass and run effectively to win the game. That means, first and foremost, the receiving crew needs to have a great game, proper routes and spacing, get separation early and often, catch the ball, etc. Secondly, the line is gonna need to id the blocks properly for the run game, and pass protection as well. We can’t have unblocked defenders making plays in the backfield, especially on critical downs. Imho, “identity” will result from executing those things successfully.
There were games this year, KState the most notable, in which we moved the ball very effectively without the qb run game. (Last season’s ‘bama game is another notable example.) Others in which it appeared necessary to success. Not sure whether it will be necessary in this game, but given Clemson’s defensive success, it seems likely that all possible weapons will be needed.
I can agree with most of this except that Clemson hasn’t seen a good OL or RB. They played UGA and Gurley ran all over them.
That’s right. Samaje can do the same but only if TK is clicking at QB.
I agree completely. We have to keep their secondary honest and not allow them to just play the run.
I think it may be more about Heupel vs Heupel than anything.