Image via zimbio.com
* Zack Sanchez (injury) & Julian Wilson (match-up) – Without going back to check (forgive me, I’m lazy), I feel like I’ve mentioned the secondary in some way or fashion every week so far. I suppose it’s somewhat understandable given how solid (excluding depth) the front seven appears to be, so hopefully my repeated bringing up of the same position group hasn’t become tiresome and/or redundant. For whatever it’s worth, I do feel like each time I’ve brought them up it’s been for different reasons. And I do so again here.
Two things as I mentioned, how much — if at all — does Sanchez’s shoulder injury come into play Saturday night and should/will they make a concerted effort to match up Wilson on Marquez North. My hope on them doing the latter is two-fold. (1) With Von Pearson expected to miss the game, North is easily (in my opinion) Tennessee’s best receiver coming into this game. If you’re willing to accept I know what I’m talking about regarding North, you may then be asking ‘If he’s their best receiver, why wouldn’t you want Sanchez on him?” Which leads me to (2) North’s NFL body — he’s listed at 6’4″ 221 lbs. — and I can’t help but feel having a bigger corner like OU does in Wilson presents a much more favorable match-up than the talented in his own right but much smaller in comparison Sanchez.
However, I’m watched Bob & Mike defenses long enough to know only in the most rare instances — like last year at K-State when they tried to hold Colvin out but were then forced to play him — allow one of their guys to shadow a receiver wherever they go on the field. They generally keep their corners on one side of the field and whoever lines up there is who you’re matched up against. So, in theory if Mike isn’t willing to shadow, it’s a match-up the Vols could try to exploit against a smaller Sanchez also dealing with an injury.
* OU’s front seven – I certainly wouldn’t go so far as to say I’m concerned that OU is only tied for 55th in the country (with Tennessee, among others, ironically) with just four sacks thru their first two games, but I’d be lying if I said my expectations weren’t for that number to be bigger than it currently is. Geneo Grissom, Jordan Evans, and Dom Alexander have all yet to record a sack. Eric Striker is only on record for having 0.5 sacks. Charles Tapper only has one sack. And it’s not just about the actual statistic itself, but it hasn’t felt like most of those guys have been as disruptive as I expected….yet.
I know the defense has probably been even more vanilla than their counterparts on the other side of the ball, which is why I’m nowhere near ready to hit the panic button or anything like that. But I am really hoping to see M.Stoops let them loose Saturday night. Especially against what should be a significantly over-matched and green Tennessee offensive line.
* A pass-catcher not named Shepard or Neal – This one isn’t particularly unique as it’s something pretty much anyone who has watched the first two games is also saying, but that doesn’t make it any less accurate. Obviously it would only help this offense and Trevor Knight if a third consistent threat of some sort would emerge. And some might even argue a second as Neal’s inclusion here is really based primarily off one game, the most recent against Tulsa, but the expectation all along was that he’d be the No. 2 guy. So what he did last week hopefully was the first sign of more to come. But back on topic.
I don’t particularly care who it is, but I’d like to see someone other than those two guys step up and have a big game. K.J. Young, Blake Bell, Michiah Quick (I know he’s a freshman, but after all we heard this summer where has he been these first two games?), Derrick Woods, Jordan Smallwood, whomever.
* Steven Parker – Admittedly, this is more of a gut feel type of deal. I see Tennessee trying to spread out this OU defense with three & four WR sets, which based on the first two games means Parker would likely see plenty of action. Meaning if my hunch is correct, I could see Parker having that breakout performance type of game. A bunch of tackles, maybe even an interception (or two). It could be a real coming out party for the incredibly talented true freshman.
* Ty Darlington – Having watched the Texas/BYU game and witnessing what a monster Malcom Brown was/is in the middle of that defense, I wanted to go back and spend some more time focusing on Darlington’s play thru these first two games. I’m only about halfway through the Tulsa game and haven’t really seen anything that concerned me, but Tulsa also doesn’t have anyone even remotely approaching Brown’s ability. To be fair, few teams do, be they in the Big 12 (OU’s Jordan Phillips 0bviously being one of those few) or nationally. But it’s just something to keep an eye on going forward if this team, as it looks to this point, is going to rely heavily on their ability to run the ball.
What can I tell you, the prospect of potentially losing to a lesser Texas team in Dallas for a second consecutive year is not a prospect that excites me very much. Like I said, could easily prove to be a non-issue but just something to keep an eye on.
* The scoreboard – Despite the misguided chiding from some who either don’t know or refuse to acknowledge OU fans don’t want the starters in late in games that are well in hand any more than you enjoy ripping Bob for having them in, it has never been Stoops’ style to run up the score.
So I’m not expecting that to change Saturday night. But given that it’s an SEC team, on a nationally televised game in prime-time, I could see him holding off just a little longer than usual to call off the dogs. That’s of course operating under the assumption that OU plays as well as we’re all expecting and Tennessee proves to be as outmatched as many of us believe them to be.
I don’t think anyone is looking forward to the possibility of having to sweat this one out well into the evening Saturday.
—-
What will you be watching for Saturday night?
55 Comments
I will be looking for a motivated and angry team that is looking to make a statement. I want to see Josh H. lean on the power run game to set up the pass and possibly creative run game with the wide outs coming in motion. I want Trevor Knight to be the icing on the cake rather putting all our eggs in his basket and expecting him to carry us to victory. I need to see a change in philosophy from the offensive side in BIG GAMES.
Looking for a frothing at the mouth, beast of a defense showing up to greet anything Tennessee throws at them! Be relentless D! BOOMER
SOONER!
The OU offensive line making hole after hole and the team rushing for 250 yards and 4 TDs. This one thing will solve more problems for the entire team than anything else. Young secondary, keep the ball out of the opposing QBs hand. Young WR, run the ball well and have 3rd and 2s instead of 3rd and 8s.
I think if we can dominate in the trenches everything else will fall into place. With the way our O line has been blocking i’m hoping for big gains on the ground and showing off our stable of backs.
“I think if we can dominate in the trenches”
I’ll be extremely disappointed if OU doesn’t do exactly that.
Very true. I guess I should say when we dominate in the trenches. 🙂
Jordan, I totally get what youre saying regarding our low sack total. I thought that we’d definitely have more by now as well. That being said I think that a main reason that its so low is that because our front 7 is so feared that as a result we’re being short passed to death. Not a lot of time to sack a QB when the opposing team is slant passing like crazy.
I tend to agree. That’s why I tried to go out of my way to express I wasn’t freaking out about it. Hopefully that came through, based on my past “work” that isn’t always the case 🙂
secondary performance and pass game. I am not comfortable with either right now and would be happy to see improvement.
I’ll be watching 21 points being put up in the first quarter by the OU offense (and maybe defense), but mainly I will be watching the very first drive by Tennessee as it will dictate how the game is going to go in my opinion. I expect heavy pressure up the middle and on the right side of the Tenn offensive line, a quick three-and-out, and a nice punt return by Sterling.
I look for the Sooners to play clean. On their toes. In games where they have been flat and trodding around on the balls of their cleats, and get beat, I have resigned myself to their not deserving a shot at the championship. I can only hope and expect this team to understand there are 13 people taking a snapshot of them each week, and what they see needs to be impressive. No slouching around at the door with your wifebeater on!
I would like to see OUs run game get going early. I bet they will have two long rushing touchdowns on Saturday. Perine also to embarress UTs DBs
Jordan – What’s your score prediction for Saturday night??
Haven’t really put much thought into one quite yet.
What is the reason for leaving CB’s on one side of the field? That is certainly not something that only Mike/OU does, but I don’t really understand the reasoning. GB was able to completely negate Sherman (Seattle) in Week 1 of the NFL. They simply sent their 2nd or 3rd best receiver to his side of the field, and ignored them. Why would Seattle not want to match him up against GB’s best receiver? If not every play, at least on occasion. That way if they are still going to avoid that CB, at least you (Seattle in this case) get to take out their #1 receiver as well.
For our defense the short answer would be that it helps disguise coverages.
Its because sherman isnt as good as sherman thinks he is. If he always played against a teams #1 receiver, his aura would get shattered. Personally I think hes the 3rd best player in that secondary(kam and thomas are better, IMO)
It theoretically cut the field in half for the Seahawks defensively. I think if you constantly put your best corner on the best receiver it gives the offense a predetermined advantage. The offense can determine the position of your best player just by formation. Defense is all about speed and reaction. At least if he lines up on the same side each time the defense knows what their going to get.
I’m a little nervous about this one insomuch as I feel that how good Tennessee is or isn’t is still somewhat unknown. They seem to be on the upswing, and they could be a team ripe for a breakout moment, ready to try and make some kind of statement. (Remembering Notre Dame from 2012). Hoping we can start fast and take control of this game early then coast through the 2nd half.
I’m not that concerned. You do realize they had no starts on their OL or DL coming into this season. I like our chance to really dominate in the trenches.
They had trouble running against USU and Arkie St.
I expect them to abandon the run early and chunk the ball.
Curious about how our O-line will look. We’ve heard the Vols linebacker corps is good, but not much about their D line.
Their D-line is just like their O-line, all new for 2014.
While, I do want to see Heupel open up the playbook a little. I hope we don’t get away from the run too early. 3 and outs are confidence killers. We’re still a young team with a young QB. Run the ball! It’ll pay dividends in the 2nd half.
Ditto. Heupel cannot afford to have consecutive thee and outs with six straight passes. Worse yet, getting behind in the chains with 2nd and long.
I say we pound the rock early and often on UT’s very inexperienced DL.
I want to see Bob put the boot on their neck once we get a lead. Don’t call the dogs off until Tennessee is beat down and doesn’t want anymore.
Totally agree Jordan with the sack stat thoughts…I truely was expecting more than what we’ve seen so far
Once Mike really starts confusing QBs with blitzes/coverage, the quick passing will get OU a lot of picks. Hold on to it too long trying to find someone open and it’s sack time.
IMO the sack stats reflect how good our D-line is, but in a round about way. Teams know coming in that the D-line is something to gameplan for and are doing just that. Tulsa’s QB was making sure the football was out in a hurry, and same goes for LA-tech. The common theme for both of those teams was that they also weren’t scoring. I think as we go through the season opponents will be trying to develop more complicated plays that take longer and we will start to see more sacks. Also our D-line has only really played 4 quarters so far…
I will be watching the attitude and emotion of the team overall.
I hope they come out of the tunnel with their hair on fire. We haven’t seen that in the first two games, only physicality and technique. This will be a rowdy striped stadium in prime time on national tv. I expect the Sooners to play up to the environment and to be doing the “jump around” in the 2nd quarter.
Somewhat off topic, but since kickoff is still 2 more days away, one of the games tonight is mildly interesting since it is a matchup of Texas first game of the season (North Texas) vs OU’s first game of the season (La Tech). Since both the Sooners and the Horns dominated in these, just curious how these 2 will look against each other.
I’ll watching to see how well the secondary can hold if/when Sanchez (or Wilson) comes out.
Tulsa picked on Jordan Thomas with some success once Sanchez went out. It was Tulsa’s first sustained drive (13 plays – 55 yards), which was saved by the Evans to Phillips fumble. I bet if you went back and looked, most of Tulsa’s completed passes weren’t against Sanchez or Wilson.
I will be watching how well we do with “standard” plays. How well we run, pass, and defend withOUT exotic blitzes or “trick” offensive plays. If OU is going to be successful with less finesse and more physical play, it will show on the bread-and-butter plays.
Figured my fellow OU brethren has already seen this….still pretty funny. Tennessee Football columnist John Adams shares his thoughts on the Tennessee vs. Oklahoma
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmPTyZb4AW0
Looks like they have their own Berry Tramel.
Haha thats good
good one..”bouncing back from adversity…”
I want to see four things.
1. how we tackle. Both games we have had issues with wrapping up and actually tackling.
2. If we get up will we continue to play or let up. Last week I know that the defense was playing vanilla, but the effort from 2qtr on was very vanilla. Just going through the motions. I want to see them put a whole game together.
3. I want to see one guy out of Thomas, Byrd, and Parker stand out and take the safety spot next to Hayes. They have all played well and that is a good problem to have but I want a guy to step up.
4. I want to see the same with the RB’s. they have all looked good. I feel like Ford has a slight edge, but I want to see a guy just rise about the others and be the guy we can count on in the crunch.
Jordan your pick on Darlington is a great one. I will be very mindful to watch that one.
I counted four or fives time where Darlington’s shotgun snaps nearly went over Trevor’s head and he had to go up and get them. If his snapping doesn’t get better, this problem will make an appearance in a big game at the wrong time somewhere down the line.
You’re absolutely right.
If I wasn’t an ou fan, I would be watching another game by half time. As an ou fan I will watch every play possible regardless of the score. I want to see the offense really display they can smoke a team that can at least go toe to toe with athletes.
I’ll be looking to see if Tenn. tries to play the “we’re not gonna let em beat us by (blank)” game. Most teams, at first, I think will decide the better bet is to load up against the run. If that’s what they do, I’ll be watching to see whether the pitch and catch long ball practice with Shep paid off. If not, I’ll be looking to see whether Ford or Ross has more breakaway runs.
On defense, I agree with the speculation that the sack issue is a result of the “Striker effect.” Teams are so scared of him getting to the qb, that they are using one or two step drop, or shotgun, and unloading the ball in about 1 sec. I’ll be looking to see if they can make the Tenn qb scramble on a regular basis.
This is the third game, and it’s the perfect time for all the things that we’ve seen hints of so far, to come together in a crushing fashion.
Man just throw a “Sooners, Vols, next” on this and start the game
I think the pass rush has been disruptive even w/out producing many sacks. Tulsa was obviously making an effort to get the ball out quick, often cutting the d-line and backers getting there hands down and negating any pass rush but that led to Geneo’s INT. What I’ll be watching is for Trevor to look like he is reading the defense and not locked on to one guy. Also will they have any other deep option then Sterling running a go.
Ditto. I would like to see a play action right and turn back to throw a seem to Bell. Or, a seem to Flowers as I think he would go unnoticed. Like to see Mead on a deep Post and KJ with a run after the catch. I like how strong Neal is so hope he’s used some on fly sweeps. Corners need to take their guys out of the game. Interested to see Mike’s strategy on how to attack.
I hope the guys aren’t reading the press clippings. All this talk about UT being no match for OU reminds me of last year’s UT game when Texas kicked our ass. This is a defining moment. No time to be vanilla, passive, or overconfident.
Since the final four tiebreaker, after SOS, is score versus common opponents, I would expect us to run it up if we can. There could be any number of SEC teams, who have also beaten Tenn, vying for a spot.
I’ll be looking for more excuses from the U of SEC.
They’re already making them in talking about UT’s youth.
SExCuses are like male nipples. They’re worthless, but they’ll never go away.
LOL!!! Hey….I’m very creative with my nipples.
Comment of the week!
I’ve read so many stories about this game online. One constant is how “physical” we are as a team. Hats off to the coaches, especially coach B and JM. I didnt think we would ever get called a hard nosed team again in the Stoops era with all the spread stuff. We have officially shed the gimmicky laser tag label of the past. Writers are using terms like juggernaut of all things. Proud of our team. Boomer!