Derek Farniok – Initial Thoughts on how he Played

Image from Soonersports.com

We’ve received a number of emails from people asking us how we felt Derek Farniok played this last Saturday against Oklahoma State.  I admit, that most of the time when I watch a game I try to watch it as a fan, so I can just enjoy it.  I’ll check the line, but I don’t really examine things until I go back and re-watch the game.  In reading some of the comments around the web about how bad Derek played, I had to stop and question myself and say how did I miss that?

In breaking down the tape, I can count 10 bad plays that Derek had.  We ran 73 plays Saturday, so for a Sophomore in his first start, I can’t say the guy played too bad.  In my educated opinion Derek played pretty well.  I’ll admit, when Derek didn’t look good on those plays I mentioned, he looked pretty bad.  But I chalk a lot of that up to inexperience and acquaintance with the speed of the game. Derek took some bad angles on some blocks, and needs to study some film, and let me speak from experience here…There is no better teacher than to see yourself in action.  I remember Coach Scheible pointing out things we did or didn’t do in film, and man, you learn so much through watching your mistakes.  Let me also point out that I thought Derek played very hard, and hustled the entire game.  We ran behind him a couple of times in short yardage, and came out fine.  I did notice that Bronson Irwin missed some twists that made Derek look bad.  I’ll outline it further in this week’s Trench Warfare posts, but for now I’ll just say that instead of passing the twist off to Derek, Bronson went outside with the player, and got in the way of him.  When Derek then tried to fight back inside, there’s no way he could have made the block.  It made him look bad, since he was the one chasing the defender, but Bronson as a senior has to be the veteran there and recognize that twist.

Also there was a play in the fourth quarter when Derek’s pulling, and it looks like he missed a guy, but if Sterling Shepard locks the guy up on his down block, we’re out on the edge with a convoy and Derek out front. There were also quite a few times that we didn’t use our numbers advantage, and Derek, in hustling out to help out the player running the ball, looked like he had missed a block, when in fact it was the player who outnumbered us and by design was unblocked that made the play.  Again that’s a liability in our offensive scheme that we must get adjusted between now and the bowl game as well as in the offseason.

 I’d like to see Derek adjust his stance a little.  He bends over at the waist too much instead of sinking his hips and bending at the knees.  It’s causing him to be slow out of his stance, and at 6’9″, he has to focus on getting lower and playing with good pad level.  He really needs to concentrate on getting his head across, especially on play away, but I tell ya if we run off tackle or a counter behind him, he can get movement on the players he’s blocking.  If we run right behind him and force that defender playing over him to have to deal with him, he’s a force.  Now on the combo blocking he had trouble and it’s something that he has to get game repetitions doing. I wish we had another game between now and Bama for him to get more experience, but if he does his homework in the film room, he can get better quickly.

If I’m Coach Bedenbaugh I move Daryl Williams over to the left tackle spot to deal with the other team’s pass rush specialist, and let Derek play right.  Traditionally the right side Tackles are road graders and that is who Derek is.  You can tell the kid is a fighter and a worker.  He’s still young and has two more offseasons in the program.  Derek’s strengths are blocking straight ahead, being physical and playing to the whistle.  As he refines his technique, gets a little bit better in his footwork and uses his hands more, he’ll be a good one for us.  When he struggles it’s because he loses his technique.  As he gets to the bottom of the well, he has to punch and use those long arms he has.  He drops his hands, and lets people get in on him, when he shouldn’t.  Again that’s something that can be taught.  I will tell you this, when the chips were down, on that last drive, Derek looked better than he did all day.  He strung together eight good plays that really showed me that the kid can rise to the occasion.  When he has the responsibility of being a starter, and his team needs him, the kid has guts.

It’s so hard to explain to people that haven’t played in college how much you can grow. But all of you reading this know that if you’ve ever worked at something you can really transform yourself. You can become something you never imagined. When you’re playing in HS you’re never forced to realize your potential. When I played in college, I was completely different physically on my way out the program than I was coming in. As I’ve said for a while now OL development takes time and you have to the right eyes to notice whether what you need from a kid is there and it just needs time and experience to come out or if it’s just not there. And there is a fine line. I’ve defended Derek Farniok and Kyle Marrs because I see something there and I know what kind of coaching they’re getting and I know what raw tools they have. Derek got better throughout this one game. He’s going to get even better in the next game and better in the one after that and eventually folks that are criticizing the kid will be singing his praises as well.

I’ll have more on Derek as I do the Trench Warfare breakdowns but I wanted to get y’all some initial impressions.

20 Comments

  • Indy_sooner says:

    Thanks for breaking this down JY! Was really looking forward to this. I cannot find stats anywhere, was this his first game as a starter?
    For non-players like myself, I don’t think the issue of change development is that hard. It’s about having good coaches to help you develop and especially those that put you in a position to succeed and for the player to work on his technique and demonstrate good work ethic. We have good ones in Bedenbaugh and JM and you can see the leaps made by Philips, Nelson et al.

    Side rant not related to this post – IMO it is NEVER, appropriate to call out kids. They don’t owe anyone on the boards anything, outside the LOI they signed. I am always baffled at how quickly the other boards immolate into railing our players because of a bad game. I don’t even feel it necessary for players like Ikard to apologize after a game… what for?
    They owe it to themselves to deliver on their education, keep a clean sheet and work hard on and off the field. Will there be mistakes? Sure! But positive critique, like what you have, is way more helpful than blanket dismissals writing off 18-21 yr olds for throwing interceptions or missing a tackle. I hope that we are able to maintain that level of civility here.

    • JY says:

      It was his first start. I agree that we shouldn’t call any kids out, but there are those folks in every fan base. As far as the civility goes, we will maintain that here. If we don’t believe that someone’s being appropriate, we’ll delete their comment. We don’t answer to subscribers, so by not taking anyone’s money, they don’t have the “right” to come and bash someone. We can discuss things like adults, but part of our motivation in starting this thing is that we were burnt out on the negativity in some other places. Thanks again for the post!

  • soonerthunder says:

    thank you! I love this website. Best I’ve ever seen. How many of those bad plays, and plays it appeared he looked bad, were in the 1st half compared to the 2nd half? It seemed we blocked better and played better from the outset in the 2nd half, both on O and D. It appeared to me that OU coaches made great adjustments.

    I’ve always thought that the team playing the worst in the first half has a little bit of an advantage if the coaching, talent and score is close, especially, b/c they will make adjustments at half, whereas the team playing the best doesn’t think they need to adjust anything, just keep playing like they are. I’ve noticed that many times the first possession of the halves an O might drive down the field, however, the D coaches get over there and tell the players what the other team is doing and a/f that shut the O down, or slow them down. It’s adjustments during the game that are critical, however, they c/make more and talk things through better at half, of course.

    A lot was said about TK’s 1st Q of the first game, but several coaches said a/f the game that it wasn’t until the 2ndQ that the OL figured out what ULM was doing. first games are like that. An opponent c/put lots of new things in that have never shown up on tape b/f.

    • JY says:

      Well there were probably a couple less in the second half, but as I mentioned, kid was nails on that last drive. On the very last play, they had Clay help chip on that d-end, but still it was a very nice job. A lot of taking a job, or becoming a starter, is embracing the responsibility that comes with it. Then preparing like you’re still trying to get the job even after you’ve been there for a long time. It’ll be huge to see how much he progresses between now and the bowl, and then through the spring and into next fall.

  • Jsteeezy says:

    What is the status on Shead and Thompson?

  • JSam says:

    It’s funny that AS I’M WATCHING THE GAME, I’m thinking, “I’m looking forward to reading what JY sees in Trench Warfare…” LOL.

    I knew this would be a good one for you to analyze with the injuries, etc. Seemed like the Pokes really (understandably) tried to throw some confusion in their twists and stunts. I remember watching that twist you mentioned when Irwin stayed with his block. There was simply NO way for Derek to make that block. I noted after that play that he and Bronson were talking quite a bit and working some things out.

    Some good things, some less-than-good, but he logged an entire game for the first time and got better and was part of a huge win. We’ll done, young man. Now, learn and improve – there’s some big beefeaters in ‘Bama that you’re going to need to surprise.

    • JY says:

      I admit that it’s more fun to do when we’re gashing people, but I agree. Derek got a bad rap this past weekend, and he shouldn’t have. Obviously, Tyrus was the starter for a reason, but Derek isn’t a bad player. He’s only going to get better. Thanks for the compliment and the post! Trench Warfare 1st quarter’ll be up tomorrow!

  • CyberSooner says:

    When you say pass the twist, is this the same thing as a stunt. Maybe I’m dating myself, but just curious.

  • Bob Dame says:

    JY – I appreciate you comments about Franiok. You may be correct, that with coaching and dedicated effort he can become a good tackle for us. I must say though, after watching him on every play of the game, he doesn’t appear ready for prime time. He was slow coming out of his stance (just slow period), appeared to not know some of his blocking assignments and held his opponent almost every time he got beat. Was surprised he only got flagged once. I must admit I don’t know how good the defensive ends he faced were. I believe one was a soph. and the other a red shirt fresh, and I’m guessing neither will make all conference. Against Alabama’s defensive ends I suspect it could get pretty ugly. I don’t recall OU running directly behind Farniok nor seeing him as a “force” against a player playing over him, but what I did notice is very high percentage of our plays going to the opposite side, which I think reveals what the coaches think about his current capabilities. If what I heard today is true, and Tyrus Thompson is unable to play against Alabama, I have great concern about our offense’s ability to move the ball even if the coaches move some players around as you have suggested.

  • Cary Newman says:

    Heupel and Mike said today that Tyrus is definitely out for the Bowl Game.