A Tale Of Two Minds (Edited)

Image via 247 Sports

Yesterday, JY talked about offensive identity. So today I want to talk a little bit about defensive identity. I also want to address something Bob Stoops brought up in yesterday’s press conference. He put a lot of emphasis on the fact that much of OU’s problems came from mental errors. I read that as him saying assignment errors. While there were plenty of those, after watching back I don’t believe that was the primary issue. And I certainly don’t believe it cost Oklahoma the game. There was plenty of blame to go around. The offense had its poor moments. The defense had its poor moment. But I’m a defensive guy, so that’s what I want to focus on.

Part of fighting is a mentality. I hate bend but don’t break mannerisms or scheme. You are telling your defensive players to give up something out of fear that if they don’t give up, then they’ll give up something bigger. I prefer a defense that makes it’s primary message, ‘we aren’t giving you a damn thing.’ If you beat us, you beat us. Mind you, that doesn’t mean be stupid. It doesn’t mean you go Cover-0 and blitz all night or stack the box on every down. You have to go through the process of picking and choosing what to do based on formations, down and distance, etc. But within that decision making process, you have to define whether you’re going to make those calls from the perspective that “we are going to contest everything we possibly can” or “we are going to play conservative.” I’m of the mindset you have to contest everything.

What does “everything” mean though? Everything depends on the strength and weaknesses of a team.

In the case of TCU, we were clearly ill prepared for the option game. But at the same time, the option game isn’t what killed us. In my estimation, what killed us was showing Boykin what he wanted to see pre-snap far too often. I’ve watched the first half over and over, and it was clear that when OU showed a disguised pressure look and showed a press to 5-off look, Boykin’s mannerisms changed. He’s not a thrower. He just isn’t. Can he make throws? Sure. But what he wants to do is see off coverage, feel comfortable that he can instantly throw it to that man on a stop or get a free inside release on a slant, and if it’s not there he’ll run. But when you make him read the pressure point and give him no predetermined WR to go to, he gets happy feet and will sometimes run into pressure.

The bottom line to me is Oklahoma gives it’s opponents too much respect, and sometimes they don’t give the ability of their players enough credit. OU’s defensive mentality, in my mind, should be simple. Stop the run on first down, disguise and pressure on passing downs. What I want to do is go through some of the first half drives and show how different looks changed the outcome of the series. When OU gave Boykin favorable looks, piece-by-piece he took the heart of the defense. When OU gave Boykin an unfavorable pre-snap look, he eventually made a mistake. He made a mistake before OU’s defense did and that’s all that matters.

I’ve already outlined the first scoring drive HERE. In that first drive you can see OU giving Boykin things. He continues to take what OU gives him until he takes the lead, 7-0.

Now let’s look at the next scoring drive:

This starts out very promising. OU has them in 3rd and long, and they aren’t giving an inch at the snap. You’re seeing outside CBs in press position and you’re seeing a pressure look that Boykin has to identify. My take is, you live with the result of this all day. OU has Parker lined up over the number three receiver and he’ll come on a blitz. Evans is lined up the boundary edge and will drop back to spy or rob. I love field pressure against a running QB. It’ll be man free coverage.

Painting Title_064

The ball has to come has to come out quick and it’s short of the first down by almost five yards. Sanchez is right there to make the tackle. Unfortunately he not only doesn’t bring the ball carrier down, he actually grabs his face mask and it’s an automatic first down. Bad result but they make the right call defensively. And interestingly by playing a press technique, Sanchez not only forces Boykin to throw a good ball but he puts himself in position to make the easy tackle. He’s already driving to the receiver, who hasn’t even turned around yet. How he didn’t make this play…I have no clue…but playing him off would have made this tackle even more difficult.

photo

As soon as they get this first down OU is going to bring seven into the box, play a safety down, and shift to man coverage. The coverage is good and Boykin will miss the throw. But for some reason on second down, shown below, OU is going to play conservative again. It looks like quarters coverage and the corners have a fairly standard alignment, about seven yards off. But it just doesn’t work. Sanchez isn’t going to stone his guy at the point of contact. I understand they might want to give the safeties some run reads and you can still make that call, but quarters uses man principles and you can see press or press and release. For the most part, when Boykin sees an off look in any coverage he’s going there with a stop route or a slant. Again, you know that you’ve got a corner that isn’t going to make that tackle clean at the point of contact, so let him play to his strength. Let him show Boykin a look he doesn’t want to see, namely press coverage. Bail him at the last minute if you really want to, but don’t let Boykin feel comfortable knowing he can throw it as soon as it’s snapped.

Painting Title_065

In the image above, I drew a blew line where the receiver eventually catches the ball. In the image below, you can see another line where he ends up as Sanchez attempts to drag him down. So the defense goes from 2nd and 10 to now giving up an easy eight yards giving TCU a 3rd and short. You want to get off the field on 3rd down? Quit giving them 3rd and manageable. To add insult to injury, Sanchez picks up another personal foul call and gives TCU an additional 15 yards and an automatic 1st down.

Painting Title_066

So in the image below it’s 1st and 10. OU is in man coverage with a single high safety. OU is going to play off about nine yards on both sides. They’re giving TCU a free inside release here. It doesn’t wind up costing them, but it easily could have if Boykin ever came off his first read (he makes at most two reads, and they’re almost always to the same side).

Painting Title_067

Below is the progression of the play above. Julian is playing so far off that he gives his man a free release inside and look how wide open he is! Could be an easy throw if Boykin actually saw it. Giving him an uncontested inside release this close? I just don’t get it.

Painting Title_068

So now OU is in 2nd and 7. Boykin picked up a mere three yards with his feet on first down. All is well, but OU is going to play a quarters/quarters man coverage next once again giving Boykin an easy throw and catch. Inside receiver is just going to run a quick curl/stop route and again get TCU into 3rd and short. The route will again be completely uncontested. In the red zone, if you play quarters to get your safeties involved in the run that’s fine, but you can’t give them this much space. Even if they planned an option here, they’ll check out of it for the easy pitch-and-catch.

Painting Title_069

And wouldn’t you know it, they get the easy pitch-and-catch. People want to whine about the front not getting pressure, but they couldn’t get to Boykin fast enough to stop this even if there weren’t five 300+ lbs men in front of them! And again, the coaches are complaining about 3rd down conversion defense. You win 3rd down on 2nd down! You can’t keep giving them 3rd and 1 and then complain about the 3rd down defense.

Painting Title_070

On 3rd down this is going to be an option but again, look at the off coverage! On 3rd and 1? If this is a pass, Boykin has at least an easy stop route to the boundary and a free, quick inside release to the field side. And if you think the backer can’t get in the window…no problem…they move the back to the field anyway on the option so they could just as easily have sent him to the flat and opened a clean window on a free inside route to the number two receiver on the field side. You can’t complain about not getting off the field on 3rd down when you aren’t even attempting to. I know OU likes to play a lot of off coverage in the red zone, but this is just making things way too easy for your opponent.

Painting Title_071

Below is what actually happens as things play out and its a failure by defensive alignment. OU is going to play four defenders to the boundary on two WRs. The ILB is lined up shaded over the nose, so even he isn’t in a position to take the pitch. And you’ve got your field defenders in man. Absolutely no way OU can stop this option. The tackle has an unimpeded shot at Jordan Evans, leaving Striker 1-on-2 trying to defend this option play. This time he’ll actually play Boykin (unlike earlier where he took the RB – which tells me that perhaps either he made a mistake earlier or wasn’t taught how to play the option during prep). The way Striker plays this is the most intuitive way for me, though there are multiple ways to play it, but of course he’s got to have a safety coming across the formation to take the running back.

Painting Title_072

Striker takes Boykin and there is no way Evans makes it to the pitch. And there is no safety in the area to help. Again, too easy.

Painting Title_073

I want to stop with OU’s defensive plays for a moment, because I just want to show you what happens the first time OU scores in the game. This time TCU decides too give too much space and it costs them. The safety is in man on Sterling…no way to cover that kind of stem. You’ve got an athlete like Shepard running right at you with green grass to the left and right of you. This was the TCU staff asking a player to do something he simply can’t do. But also note the outside cornerback alignments. They’re pressed to the boundary and even though they play off to the field, we’re still only look at a five yard cushion.

Painting Title_074

So the score is now 14-7 TCU, and OU is finally going to get a stop. They’re going to it by showing their aggressive identity. First down goes for a 4-yard run and Boykin misses a pass on 2nd down to bring up 3rd and 6. TCU will go with 5 WRs. OU shows a press look on the edges and two high safeties, but this will become a Cover-1 robber where Byrd comes down to get in the way of any inside routes and keep eyes on Boykin, then Thomas will drop back deep.

OU shows four rushers but Geneo will take a step or two forward at the snap, as if he’s going to blitz, and then drop as a spy. Pre-snap, Boykin knows he’s going to have to make a play. There’s nothing easy here! Boykin immediately takes the least daunting task, he’s going to hit the slant (bottom of the pic, inside WR) against Jordan Evans in off-coverage. This is how I love to see OU play.

Painting Title_076

Look how tight the coverage is! Boykin hits his receiver, but it’s a perfect throw. If he can make that all day, then he deserves to win. I have no problem with this completion. The other guys are going to make plays on occasion, so sometimes you just have to tip your cap. But at least on this particular play OU is being aggressive and not simply conceding an easy completion.

Painting Title_075

On 1st down, OU will play quarters and Boykin completes a pass. On 2nd and 6, shown in the image below, again no easy throw at the snap. Press look allows Sanchez to disguise the corner blitz, while the safety will rotate over and pick up the WR. Boykin will run right into the cornerback blitz and OU stuffs the run. There ends up being a penalty on TCU and that pushes them back anyway.

 

Painting Title_077

So on 2nd and 21, OU is showing a press look to the field. OU is going with zero safety coverage. This is a time when one might have the corner off five yards playing inside leverage to force the WR to the boundary. Instead, OU chooses to press here and while Boykin completes it, again I’ve got no problem with it as Boykin simply makes a perfect throw.

Painting Title_078

As you can see below Julian is on top of the route through the release.

 

Painting Title_079

Again below, Julian is still mostly in phase with the receiver. He turns to find the ball, but Boykin drops a perfect pass into the outstretched arms of his receiver. Julian trips a little at the end and isn’t able to make a play on the ball. Again, if Boykin can hit that all day with a blitzer in his face, then he deserves the win. The reality is he can’t, and he didn’t. Julian has a great ability to turn and look for the ball, but he does it a touch early at times and has given up a couple plays as a result. That said, I don’t fault him for it. I’d rather have a corner with the instincts to turn and find the ball lose a few battles, than someone who doesn’t have that instinct at all. People taking shots at Julian aren’t giving him enough credit. In his first year at outside corner, he’s doing a nice job and plays with good technique. In my estimation, he’s currently the best corner on the field.

Painting Title_080

Even after getting beat deep…Julian is back up on the line in the WRs freakin’ face. I love it! This ends up being an attempted screen that OU reads and stops.

Painting Title_081

On 2nd and 10 below, Boykin immediately looks over to the off-coverage right away but even though Sanchez shuffles, he still stays tight with his man and doesn’t allow the WR to stem very far. As soon as Boykin sees his first and second reads aren’t open, he tucks it and tries to run but ends up getting sacked by Striker. That’s how you play these teams. These aren’t pro QBs. You make them throw into tight windows consistently and don’t give them anything. If they beat you, they beat you. Better to go down with no bullets in the chamber.

Painting Title_082

On 3rd and long OU is going to play two man under and rush three with Geneo spying. The reason I love this play is it shows you how easy it is to create turnover situations. People are praising Boykin for taking steps forward as a QB, but that doesn’t mean he is a lights out passer just yet. If you force him to consistently make contested throws and take away his pre-snap target, he will make mistakes just like any other QB. In this case he tries to hit Julian’s man on the deep inside route. He misses his wide receiver by a bit and…

Painting Title_083

Throws the ball right into the safety’s (Byrd) hands. Unfortunately, he drops the would be INT. Remember, this is the first drive where TCU finally doesn’t score. Though it begins with a perfect deep throw by Boykin early in the drive where he hits the deep route against Julian, OU refuses to back off their coverage! So a drive that began with a single perfect throw nearly ends in a pick and definitely ends with NO points. That’s how you play freakin’ DEFENSE. Make those suckers beat you. Let him know before he even snaps the ball that he may have to go through multiple targets, and he may have to make a tight throw. Make him guess what the coverage and technique is on the play. Make the WR wonder if he’s going to have to beat you off the line, or if he’s going to have to make a contested catch.

Painting Title_084

I won’t do an outline of it, but I’ll tell you that OU will shut TCU down again on their next offensive series.

The next TCU touchdown is just a breakdown in coverage. TCU sends their RB out as a WR and goes 5 wide. At the snap, OU only has three men to cover four guys. Generally, that can be a problem. I’ve numbered each receiver below that was on the field side. Sanchez is in man (at the top of the pic) and doing a dang fine job of covering his guy, though it won’t matter because trust me, Boykin will almost never come off his first or second read. I believe the call was split coverage, man to one side and Cover-3 to the other. But Julian either didn’t get the memo or didn’t play it right. Instead of picking up the No. 2 WR, who is running a wheel route he’ll eventually score on, he mirrors his WR (No. 1) as if he thinks it’s man. The way he plays off though, it’s clear he knows the call isn’t man. I think this is just a mental lapse, or perhaps Julian just didn’t see the RB/WR running the wheel route. Not sure.

Painting Title_085

EDIT: Went back and looked at the play below again and it actually please to be a cover 3 zone blitz. When Striker blitzes, the safety picks up the slot receiver and as he puts his hands on him you can see him play outside leverage so I’m assuming he has sseam/curl zone. Just not sure why Jordan Evans comes over and picks up the RB in what appears to be man. OU actually tried to fool Boykin here by bringing the field pressure and dropping the boundary OLB (Geneo). A qb would normally see this and throw to the pressure side. I was a little thrown by the closed technique to the field (Julian) but some teams do basically lock the corner in man to make it look like man free.

Here Sanchez is going to press and bail. One of things I want you to notice as we go through this play is the clock. You can’t see it all but the time on the clock is 10:10 in the second quarter.

Painting Title_086

At the snap, Sanchez is going to immediately open up and give the WR a free inside release. Look at Jordan Phillips in the middle of the DL. At the snap, he is going to give his man a swim move and beat him immediately.

Painting Title_087

Look at the time! Within one FREAKING second Jordan Phillips is pressuring the QB, but the secondary can’t even squeeze the route long enough to make Boykin hold it for longer than that one FREAKING second!

That play went for something like 20 yards. Next time you’re quick to say the defensive line gets no pressure, be sure to look at the whole field. The more I look at this play the more I look at this play the more I think this may have simply have been a case where because Sanchez aligned in press man inside the WR, OU assumed Boykin would go away from that side or would assume he has to throw a fade and not a slant. Problem is, if that’s what Boykin thought he had no problem with it and when he turned to throw it, he got a nice surprise with a WR run free inside of the corner.

Painting Title_088

Now the good on that drive. Look at this 3rd and 4 (below). OU is saying at the snap…nothing is going to be given to you, Boykin. You’re going to have to earn it. And on this play, Boykin isn’t up to the task. OU shows a Cover-2 man under look that ends up becoming a Cover-1 robber at the snap. Sanchez is going to play a hard press technique to the boundary. The receiver tries to take an inside release, Sanchez gets physical with him at the line, and doesn’t give him a free release. Credit to Sanchez here! Tapper is going to smoke the tackle and guard through the B gap and pressure Boykin. Credit to Tap! The running back is going to go out on a wheel route.

Painting Title_089

In the image below you can see the red arrow pointed to Sanchez where he’s made the WR’s life miserable and taken away Boykin’s first read. You can see Tapper blowing by the linemen and closing in on Boykin. And you see the STUD Jordan Evans in coverage with the running back on that wheel. He’s going to play the ball beautifully and pick it off. This was just excellent team defense that was designed to be aggressive, refused to give Boykin anything easy, and demonstrated what I expected to see from Boykin if OU forced him to do this more often…he’ll make the mistake.

Painting Title_090

I know a lot of people believe the defense just isn’t what it’s cracked up to be. But there are a ton of talented players on this defense. How good they can be is about trusting them to play up to their ability and recognizing that you are going to get beat on occasion. But if you play defense simply to not get beat, you’ll die a thousand slow deaths. We saw it play out in the Notre Dame game two years ago, we saw it in that nightmare of a game against West Virginia, and we saw it play out — at least on occasion — in the TCU game this past weekend.

52 Comments

  • Jordan Esco says:

    I just have to commend K on this. IMO, it’s simply fantastic. I know this style of post might not be for everyone, but personally it’s the kind of stuff I love to read. And there are so few, if any, other OU sites doing stuff like this (which is not what my point is about, but something that can’t avoid being mentioned if you do like reading this type of stuff).

    Admittedly, as I was going thru and editing it made me even more mad about the loss b/c so much of what Mike did defensively appears to make very little sense. But at the same time I’m smarter now for having read thru this. And I am one of those people who didn’t focus enough on how the soft coverage was taking away from the job the d-line did, at times, getting pressure but also getting sabotaged by said coverage.

    Great, great work, K

    • Soonerr says:

      My sentiments exactly!

    • DCinAZ says:

      Posts like this are what I want to see. Breakdowns by people who actually played the game instead of reading the nonsense that career analysts and casual fans observed. I’m of the opinion that people who actually played (or coached) the game watch football entirely differently than casual fans and this site confirms that for me. I’ve always struggled talking OU football with buddies that never played and what I see vs. what they think they see.

      • Jordan Esco says:

        I wouldn’t disagree. I would simply add that I do think there is value in the “common fan’s” take as well as there clearly is A LOT of value in the opinion of guys like those in the header on the site who did play the game.

    • disqus_uj44WuVjt2 says:

      Agree, excellent write up. This is not rocket science, it’s letting your athletes know how things should be done and then letting them do it. But if you start with the wrong philosophy, your kids, unless greatly superior athletically, are going to be in a dog fight, when it should not be so!!! I think the OU coaches out think themselves and end up creating their typical annul EGG game!!!

  • KOKEVO says:

    this is by far the best break down you could ask for on the game it only makes me scratch my head even more on the defense schemes.

  • OklaSooner says:

    I’m on track to have died 10 thousand slow deaths by the weekend..

  • Dwebb96 says:

    Reading this breakdown makes the loss a little easier to bear. Not sure why, but it does. Thanks K, for your work. I seldom visit other sites anymore, I have become very spoiled.

  • CS says:

    Brilliant! Just Brilliant!

  • FeedtheMonster says:

    Every time I see the corners SO far off the WRs I lose my mind. This breakdown makes it as plain as day that they should get up to the line and stay aggressive. Trust your players’ abilities.

  • Bill Hasseberg says:

    Your work here is superb. None other like it that I’m aware of. I often wonder when you work or sleep or do you?

  • DCinAZ says:

    So basically Bob’s comments about “execution” are as much bullsh*t as we think they are and the players are being failed by the coaches more than they’re not “executing”?

  • OUknowitscomin says:

    K, thank you. Containment D drives me nuts too, just nuts. I saw it on line often too, but thanks for pointing out secondary. I’ve been saying same last few days in sense that our D can be great if allowed their identity. Play aggressive. That’s what we’ve recruited for. Remarkably similar to using TK in ways he’s not meant for, pocket passer. Why recruit types that you don’t utilize their strengths.
    Ironically, both O & D schemed opposite of strengths in same game, if EITHER plays to strengths, we win. At least Mike made adjustments instead of beating head on wall.
    While Mike tries different approaches that fail sometimes, I could see the adjustments gradually being made. The 2nd half is a tribute to that.
    It’s when we do same thing not working entire game that drives me nuts. Like the O did.

  • soonerinks says:

    Why on some short distance plays do our corners play off 5-8 yards (not only play off but they are on their heels and sometimes immediately back pedaling)? Any completion is going to be an automatic 1st down if the QB can get it out quick enough. Drives me crazy.

  • Krys Allen says:

    So the 10 million dollar question… why do our coaches not see the same thing. Thanks for the great breakdown.

    • Mike Reed says:

      My thoughts exactly!!! I believe Mike Stoops to be one of the best defensive coaches in the country, but why does crap like this happen? It’s mind numbing!!!

    • Glocal Sooner says:

      I’ve been wondering that all week on each one of these great write-ups and breakdowns by TFB’s. Do our coaches see the same thing or do they see/believe something totally different. Awesome work this week guys despite our disappointing loss.

  • Lesslie Stanford says:

    Playing man and playing 8 yards off the ball will be a nightmare against Baylor. Their WR are better than the TCU ones and Petty is 10 times the QB that Boykin is. We have to get up and pressure them.

  • John Garner says:

    A truly awesome breakdown. Explains a lot and pisses me off even more. I can’t believe we got away from the mind set that beat a powerful Alabama team. That kind of no fear, play to win attitude is what we need finish the season.

  • L'carpetron Dookmarriot says:

    Perhaps examples of sub-optimal play calls that were executed about as well as possible (sometimes ineffectively), still resulting in effective plays by TCU.

    What we heard from coaches after the game was that “they weren’t mentally disciplined…,” “they didn’t execute well…,” and so on. As another poster said, I don’t understand the often blaming of the players for “not executing well” or “making mistakes” when sub-optimal play calls can increase the likelihood that a player doesn’t make a play or makes a mistake.

    Rarely do we hear the coaches say things like “I didn’t call plays well today” or “My game plan wasn’t very good.” Usually, it’s something like “we got outcoached.” That’s all they say and move on. Yet, they will often say more about the execution and the mistakes the players made. I understand that the coaches develop the game plan and call the plays.

    While this is a defensive post, I think these same play call/game plan issues were evident on the offensive side. OU against TCU didn’t look like OU over the last 5-7 games. It’s as if they reverted back to OU of early last year. I think OU played well enough to win the game. There were several opportunities to intercept the ball, and they made some plays late in the game in terms of other turnovers. However, what appears to me to be a poor play call, a QB run with little time on the clock, showed up just when Heupel needed to get a TD.

    This game by Mike seems less to me about defensive identity, just a poorly-called/planned game. The defense seems to have more of an identity than the offense. Not sure what’s going on there. It seems that through these games this year that OU’s lack of offensive identity hasn’t been shown to be a weakness.

    • TheUndefeated says:

      You do realize that texas’s defensive game plan will be to shut down the run, get after the QB, and make tk9 (jh, too) beat them? Unless I’m missing your point – which is highly likely – tk9 (& jh) is going to have the same obstacles to deal with in the RRS that he did in Ft. Worth. 33 points against an excellent TCU defense is great, but tk9 was weakening as the game went on, and some would argue his pick six was the difference in the game. Our O may not have an identity, but with tk9 at the helm – and jh behind him – it can be exploited given the right personnel and plan. I’m glad ut’s offense is struggling, I just hope it doesn’t find itself at our expense.

  • TheUndefeated says:

    K, this is simply fantastic stuff!! Thank you for putting all this together. I can imagine the corners get gassed sometimes, and press coverage is probably the most physically demanding of all the cover techniques. Allowing them to play off a bit *may* give them a bit of a breather. Just a theory. I don’t remember seeing much substituting at the corners, so Mike is probably trying to keep them in the game until the end. Also, doesn’t press coverage (or man, if you will) make the DBs susceptible to turning their backs on the RBs/QBs? The coaches *may* have been worried about losing contain on Boykin … just another theory. I’m in full “I HATE TEXAS!!!” mode right now, and if our secondary allows Swoooops (or whatever his name is) a Case-McCoy game like last year, I’m gonna have an epic meltdown this Saturday.

  • Boom says:

    K, To spend as much time as you did definitely shows passion. It’s the same passion we feel as fans. Having the positive and negative breakdown provides us with answers as to what happened. We appreciate it from not only you but the rest of the team at TFB. Let’s run the table. Thanks again.

    • Super K says:

      Appreciate it Boom. When OU loses I always want to know, is it something that can be avoided from here on out or not. So I go back and look and look and look 🙂

  • Navy_UDT says:

    Having played the game, this is an outstanding overview of our defense last week. This site is absolutely the best, period. I feel as though we need to change our attack mode on D and as stated, let the players play. Keep up the great work guys!

  • Cush Creekmont says:

    Excellent work! I was amazed how OU turned Boykin into Tom Brady, but your article explained how little he had to think.

    The nuance and tactics should fall to far more football-educated minds than mine, but in my business, I play to my company strengths. If the D-line is as strong and fast as they appear (and we were led to believe by the coaches), I would be aggressive in coverage to make the QB hold the ball and maximize their opportunities for sacks, fumbles and errant throws.

  • Doobie74OU says:

    I’m going back to the well one more time! I’ll take one more swing and try to hit a home run! I’ll take one more shot and hope its the game winner! Isn’t the fact that Jordan Evans is playing so well at ILB the reason you offer a kid like McKinley Whitfield. Evans is 6’3 225-230lb ranges and Whitfield is listed at 6’4″ 195lbs probably playing over 200lbs by now. With a year of OU strength training this guy is Jordan Evans reborn! It is not a life or death matter for the team and recruiting is far from over, but for the coaches to act confused about were to play a kid with that size and athleticism all they have to do is open their eyes and look at a guy right in front of them. Either way I thought Evans played a great game this past week!

  • Ed Cotter says:

    Wow, great breakdown Super K. I was wondering why we were playing so far off on the corners on second down. Didn’t make sense to just give those short inside throws so that 3rd would be more manageable. Too many dang mistakes (penalties, missed tackles, and dropped INTs) when they had TCU dead to rights stopped. Thanks again for the defensive breakdown.

    • Doobie74OU says:

      Even when things went right in this game they went wrong! On at least two of the pass deflections we had the OU defender was standing between the ball and the receiver, and Sanchez jumped one so well he would have housed it because he had nothing in front of him but green grass and blue skies! Made way to many mistakes and even when we did something right it didn’t work out! SMH!

    • Super K says:

      I think its part of their defensive alignment. They teach a certain alignment and a certain technique. For example in quarters coverage their alignment is somewhat standard but I just don’t like it. I prefer seeing alignments like TCU and Michigan State. They don’t give you any room and they teach secondary skills like no one else.

      • Ed Cotter says:

        With both Mike and BJW working the secondary there should be no reason we can’t teach those skills. I am with you, I like the tight coverage. I was a CB and Safety in HS and we worked in close bump coverage with safety help behind. We had safety and corner blitzes, the whole thing. Once I got to college I saw I didn’t have the requisite speed for DB, so switched over to WR. INTERESTING NOTE: My College teammate at Humboldt State, Robert Prince, is Ryan Broyles WR Coach with the Lions.

  • Doobie74OU says:

    I also had a bit of a problem with our CB/S blitz this week. It seemed like TCU was lining up their inside WR really wide to make the CB/S declare before the snap with hard counts. On most of those plays the CB/S was in No Mans Land at the snap of the ball! To far away to be an effective on a blitz and nowhere near his man in coverage. Seems like we got out of position several times in those blitz packages!

    • Super K says:

      The one that really stunk was when OU had them in 3rd and long and Julian came on a corner blitz. Hatari was lined up really far inside and when he tried to come over to cover his man it was just too late. Boykin just threw it immediately and the guy was wide open.

      • Boom says:

        Typical of the whole night. Like the old song, I been in the right place
        But it must have been the wrong time, Dr. John.

  • Stats says:

    Does anyone have any insight in those wide splits the TCU offensive line was showing on occasion? I believe the commentators suggested that it would push the OLB’s out further to give the QB more time by reducing outside pressure.
    – Did TCU do that often? Certain situations? I didn’t notice how often they did it, and I haven’t re-watched the game yet.
    – Was it effective? Were they successful on those plays? Might Texas try it?
    – Did OU respond to it well? I assume there is a defensive counter to that strategy.

    • Super K says:

      They did it a few times from what I recall. They were able to pick up a few yards running like that. It wasn’t a game changer. I think you can try to counter it by showing what OU calls their”chaos” front…just get guys moving around so they don’t know who is coming through the interior gaps. Just a guess.

  • SoonerBredCD says:

    Great stuff K!

  • Kevin says:

    As hard as it is to revisit a losing game, these sorts of breakdowns really make it worthwhile. I learn so much reading these analyses! I hope that there will be some honest re-evaluation of the team’s strategies heading into the rest of this season which now seems that much more difficult to overcome this year.

  • Won says:

    TFB is the best!

  • Kody K. says:

    K–YESSSSS, I totally felt like you were speaking for me and getting it off my chest! So many good points that you made. Definitely some of the most concise points you’ve made. I played corner from peewee all the way through high school at only 5’5″ tall and made All Metro every year. I had to play aggressive and menace the receivers. I just don’t understand why they are consistently giving so much cushion. Julian is no doubt our best corner. Sanchez is great at getting oskies but needs to work on tackling. The effort he gives tackling kind of indicates to me that he feels that’s not an important part of his job. I thought he was giving excessive cushion because he has shown propensity to bite on the double move. The slants were the hardest for me to cover. I remember one game I got burnt twice on sharp slants until I started JAMMING them at the line. The reason I’m so devastated on this loss is because we beat ourselves. Years back we got out coached by Boise State which really hurt. This time against TCU we out coached ourselves. I am just so frustrated. JH needs a lot more help calling plays. He is not getting the job done. The offensive philosophy is not getting the job done!

  • Kevin Osborn says:

    Great read! I enjoy these more indepth post. Sure the 30,000 ft high views/opinion post have their place, but ill take a good indepth post breaking down the actual events over that any day, Great job!

  • Hollerback says:

    I saw the same things when I watched the game. Knew it was going to a poor defensive showing because of the bad game plan. Boggles my mind, and we took a loss.