K(eep). I(t). S(imple). S(toops).

Image via Dallas News

I’ll begin this brief piece by a quote from Gary Patterson, one of the great defensive minds of this era (even in spite of having very recently given up 1 60+ spot to Baylor):

“In this day and age of college football, offenses have become very explosive and complex in the number of formations and plays used in a game. To combat this problem, defenses must have enough flexibility in their scheme to limit offenses in their play selection, but be simple enough to be good at what they do.”

In the past couple weeks we’ve seen Oklahoma give up plays due mainly to assignment breakdowns and while that quote may not be as relevant to the play I’m going to discuss below, it is relevant to a broader philosophy that I believe in. Namely, that with all the limitations on time that coaches can spend with players and the need to play younger and younger guys, I believe it’s imperative to find the right balance of simplicity and multiplicity while focusing on skill development, as opposed to scheme complexity.

When Coach V was at Oklahoma, we repeatedly saw OU players turning to the sideline trying to figure out the call. This was particularly true in the secondary. Since coach Mike has been back, that practice has disappeared…up until recently. Breakdowns up front are bad, but not lethal. However, breakdowns in the secondary are absolutely lethal. The breakdown against TCU cost Oklahoma the football game. If it weren’t for Alex Ross’ kickoff return, the breakdown against Texas may have cost Oklahoma that game as well.

In last week’s game, outside of the wheel route Shipley had on Ahmad Thomas, good things happened when Oklahoma played man coverage on 3rd down…including Zack Sanchez’s pick six. Remember a few things that OU knew going into the Texas game: 1) Texas had an inexperienced offensive line 2) Texas had a new center 3) Texas had a young and erratic quarterback.

A defensive priority on first and second down is to stop the run. Some folks do this by calling coverages that get as many defenders in the run game as possible. KSU runs a lot of quarters coverage giving their safeties two reads, thereby allocating nine potential guys to defend the run. We can debate my philosophy in this regard later. But for now I want to specifically talk about 3rd downs. To me, if you’ve got the players to do it, 3rd down is man coverage and pressure. And against Texas, I’m going to be pressuring that center (and really most of their entire o-line) all game. A green center with a linebacker flying up into the A-gap repeatedly is going to, at some point, give you some bad snaps.

The play I’m going to outline below was on 3rd and 12. Obviously, this is a passing down. To me, against Texas, this should be a pressure/man coverage down. I wouldn’t even try to disguise it. I’d simply say, we’re locking you down and we’re going to pressure you.

Before I break this play down, I’m going to tell you that everyone…the Oklahoma media…even the television announcer blamed Ahmad Thomas for the bust on this play. But Thomas didn’t bust. However, the point of this post isn’t to find out who busted. It’s to question why you’d run such a complex coverage against an inept offense on 3rd and long when you have four legitimate cover guys on the field, two young safeties, and are facing three WR set.

I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out the coverage here and finally came to the conclusion that it’s what I call a Cover-3 Mamba. Patterson had something similar back in the day he’d run that looked like this but, it’s the first time this year I’ve seen Oklahoma run this coverage.

Let’s begin…

This is the look, pre-snap. We’ve got a double eagle front (2 LBs lined up in the A-gaps over the center). These guys are going to drop, but as I said, I would have played man and blitzed at least one of these guys. This look freaks a green center out and bringing quick guys like that, along with all the pressure points these OU pass rushers create, would make things really tough.

On the back end, you’ve got split safeties with the corners playing off about 7 yards. It looks somewhat like quarters coverage pre-snap and at a certain point, when watching this play transpire, I thought maybe it was a modified quarters coverage.

Painting Title_091

What’s going to happen (and I’ve made some notes on the image below) is Shipley (in the slot with Q.Hayes lined up in front of him) is going to run a wheel route. The WR1 on the two speed side (same side Shipley is on) will run a post. The local media and the announcer assumed the call was a Cover-3 and Thomas busted by not dropping deep middle. If this was a traditional Cover-3, then that would be correct. But if you begin to watch more closely, you’ll see that it’s actually a modified Cover-3 where:

1. Julian is playing his deep third on that far side, but he’s going to essentially man up the receiver even though he’s technically in zone. I call it match man or zone with man principles…whatever.

2. Thomas’ assignment is actually not the deep middle third. In reality, he correctly broke to the near side. His assignment was the deep third on the near side (left side from the defenses perspective).

3. You’re probably thinking…wait a minute…Sanchez was deep third on that side?!? And I totally understand why you’d think that (I initially thought the same), but if you watch the totality of the play progress you start to pick up some clues that he’s actually playing underneath coverage in a type of bracket call with Thomas. You could perhaps call him a curl zone defender, but really he’s just going to continue to sink because there isn’t an underneath release as the play goes on. But you will note later in the play that he’s actually going to stay underneath the route as it breaks.

4. The assumption is probably also that Q.Hayes is a curl/flat defender who simply carries the wheel route all the way. But I don’t believe that’s the case either. I think his assignment is actually to be a lock on Shipley. So he’s a man defender in this zone call.

So who is playing the middle third?

 

Painting Title_092

As the play progresses you can see Q.Hayes at the bottom (image below) manned up on Shipley. You see Julian, at the top, play that match zone on the far side. You see Sanchez starting to linger underneath the route. You also see  Thomas (who the announcer circled in yellow) breaking over into the left 1/3. The two ILBs that were initially showing blitz are going to drop back. The WILB (Franklin) is in a hook zone and Evans is going to drop into the hole. It actually looks like he’s playing a Tampa-2 technique.

The person who was supposed to play the deep 1/3 was in fact Steven Parker. I’ve drawn an arrow from him to the deep middle 1/3. Instead, he plays it like he would in a more traditional Cover-3. And you can understand why he’s confused. There’s an appearance that no one is accounting for a possible release from a TE on the far side (unless the rushing OLB on that side was supposed to read him). If that TE releases, there appears to be no one to pick him up. And of course Parker is not a traditional deep middle player. On top of that, he’s got Jordan Evans dropping in what initially appears to be a fairly deep middle zone.

Painting Title_093

Below you see the Texas WR breaking open and Thomas trying to turn and run with him. In my opinion, Thomas has to run with this guy when he sees the deep middle is uncovered. You see Q.Hayes below running with Shipley with Sanchez continuing to get deep. And you see Parker at the top of the screen playing a hook/curl.

Painting Title_094

Below, you see where Parker would have been and where the Texas receiver broke open.

Painting Title_095

Let me be clear again. The purpose of this post isn’t to call out a player. It’s to say, with all the craziness that’s happening in a game, why such a complicated coverage call? I mean even if you want to get this creative on 3rd down…save it for Baylor.

I believe on 3rd and 12, you pressure and play man on the back end. Oklahoma has the good fortune of not only having two cover corners, they’ve also got two very legitimate cover safeties in Steven Parker and Q.Hayes. Both have cornerback-type cover ability. You can see that coach Mike knows it, as he’s moved Parker to one of the starting safety spots in the nickel package (Hatari Byrd was the the replacement safety up until this past week). OU just needs to simplify things a bit and let those guys do what they do best.

48 Comments

  • Jed says:

    Thanks for the time and effort. Adds to my appreciation of the game.

    • Super K says:

      Thanks for reading Jed!

      • Navy_UDT says:

        That was a great review of how complicated D calls can create havoc in the passing game. I like the heading, Keep it Simple Stupid, I mean Stoops. I love this sight and all of the breakdowns and insight.

      • soonermusic says:

        Really appreciate your breakdown of this play, K. It will be interesting to see if they can correct the communication problem with the coverage, or if they will simply fix it by running something different. Nice job.

  • boomersooner says:

    Shout it shout it shout it out loud

  • Soonerfandave84 says:

    I love they showed the replay of Mike Stoops trying to call timeout and didnt get it

    • Super K says:

      yeah they did. I think he tried to do it when he saw Parker starting to roll down instead of rolling over.

  • DFWOU says:

    Both Stoops were all over Parker on the sideline after this play… I initially thought it was Thomas as well – until I saw Parker getting the earful and trying to plead his case…

    • Super K says:

      I wasn’t at the game so didn’t get to see what happened on the sideline. Thanks for noting that. I still believe Parker is the guy to have on the field. I’d simplify the defense just to get him on the field. His cover skills are incredibly valuable and he’s proven to me that he can be physical as well. Very impressive dude. Props to coach Mike and coach Bob for going after him so hard.

  • CS says:

    wow! What a nice job of breaking down a play, this is just outstanding.

    • Super K says:

      Thanks CS! You’re very kind!

      • CS says:

        So, what if the TE releases? Who has him? Is that then the weakness of this coverage?

        • Super K says:

          I tried to figure that out and all I could come up with is 1) the OLB on that side was reading the TE and if he would have released then he’d follow him in coverage otherwise he’d blitz or 2) Jordan Evans busted as well.

  • Super K says:

    By the way that was supposed to say, Texas had a young and INEXPERIENCED offensive line…not “experienced”. It’s edited now.

  • Jared Tyra says:

    Even missed timeouts are game changers, but like stoops said “we have a lot to improve on and still got a win in the cotton bowl”. I’ll take knowing we were a few little things away from blowing texas up.

  • Billy Jackson says:

    The title of this article is a winner, Super K!!!

  • Exiled In Ohio says:

    K, what is the ILB in the middle doing (by the H in “hole”? Is he spying Swoopes? If Parker is supposed to be deep middle, should this ILB be more toward the far hash where he can take the TE? Sorry,l I can’t read the ILB numbers to know who they are.

    • Super K says:

      Well, I was thinking, if the OLB wasn’t reading the TE then yeah maybe Jordan Evans (ILB that dropped in the hole) was perhaps supposed to play more of a hook/curl to be able to pick up the TE. He actually initially looks like he’s dropping in a Tampa 2 which would make him the deep middle defender (though not technically as deep as the two outside safeties). In the hole he’s just acting as an extra pass defender and can come down and pick up a QB scramble or something. I just see him as a robber though football people wouldn’t technically describe it that way.

  • Sonny Schovanec says:

    Interesting read. I would argue that lessor athletes who have been coached and have played in lessor systems then Jenks in HS run more complex coverage concepts then the one shown here. Although not the perfect scenario to be in we play three coverage to this set. In this set playing three the player who has deep middle shouldn’t be preoccupied with TE only as he has another vertical threat in his zone the # 2 wr on the offense’s right. Zone is zone. It’s not the perfect situation to be in but if parker knew he had deep middle he should have been backpedaling like crazy at the snap. Parker knows that regardless of what he thinks about the TE his job is to be deeper then the deepest wr in his zone. It looks like he got caught being flat footed at the snap. with all do respect K. Great to be able to talk some ball.

    • Super K says:

      Thanks for the comment Sonny! It appears Parker didn’t realize he had deep middle.

      • Sonny Schovanec says:

        Im with you there K. He looks to be flat footed at snap. I dont need to tell you that is no bueno in zone.

  • EasTex says:

    Well done, SK.
    I agree with you, in that down and distance situation don’t give the QB time to look down field, blitz him and force him to throw under duress.

  • Brian says:

    The bottom picture shows 7 defenders guarding 3 receivers!!! Even with a bust, how did we not have it covered…And how did we not get enough pressure on Swoopes?

  • Daryl says:

    SK this is brilliant stuff. I could agree more on simple Against TCU when you can’t get guys subbed on defense correctly it feel that almost instantly tells you things are too complicated. Mike has always said simple is fast and for two weeks it’s looks complex and slow.

    Another thing you’ve mentioned in this is know who you are. Secondary is young but front 7 is really strong. I have hated watching Dline get great initial push only to shut it down and the watch the QB because he can run. I am not saying be stupid and play manny Diaz style but pressure is the worst enemy of all QB’s. We know this Dline can push and can run. Use them and make your safeties do less.

  • L'carpetron Dookmarriot says:

    7 people defending 3 players running routes. Even if the TE, RB, and QB are a threat (less likely on 3rd and 12) OU has enough to cover.

    The play call itself seems less than optimal; that along with some execution issues and we have a TD that should never have happened. A first down, I can understand. Teams make plays sometimes. This is something different.

  • Lesslie Stanford says:

    Really bad blown coverage for a TD. Parker sucks up early and bails. But doesn’t get deep enough to cover the crossing route, and Thomas not fluid enough to cover a fast guy all the way across the field.

    This was my exact notes on this play when watching it again the other day.

  • SamSooner says:

    Super K, wow! That’s good stuff. I’m ready to coach now.

  • Josh says:

    You don’t want to break this out for the 1st time against Baylor. Coaches know they have to have something lined up to combat the Baylor pics and rubs… ok the Baylor Offensive PIs that don’t get called or Petty will kill them again. I don’t mind the call and think it will pay dividends in the end. Players must communicate better and execute better.

    • Lesslie Stanford says:

      Would you rather break it out now and get a blown coverage in a win and be able to fix it or blow it in a game against a better offense?

      • Josh says:

        Exactly what I was saying. They are working things out now in order to be better for Baylor. You can’t line up down after down and run man against Baylor… Too good and too many pic plays that never get called by refs. This exact coverage is designed for Baylor

  • Josh says:

    The thing right now that’s driving me the craziest is the covering of green grass and not opposing players. Read some freaking route combinations dammit! Way too many times players have their eyes in the wrong spot. Stop staring down the QB like he is freakin 2005 VY. Get your eyes on the freakin route and be physical with the damned receiver when he is in your zone.

  • chrism891 says:

    So essentially they were suppose to roll coverage to the two receiver side… high schools run this coverage, its really not that hard to figure out. Its cover 2 on the two receiver side and cover 3 on the back side. Brain fart by a freshman, its a pick or a sack if run correctly but the safeties have to talk to each other

    • soonermusic says:

      B. Stoops remarks reflected that as well. “Our safeties rotated the wrong way, really poor communication in the secondary, there’s no excuse for it, to not be on the same page.” He made similar comments about that play in the Monday presser, “D backs not communicating with each other, …they don’t all roll the way that they’re supposed to roll…it shouldn’t happen, they’re guys that have played…all they gotta do is talk to each other.”

    • Super K says:

      I don’t know that that’s an accurate way to describe it. Sanchez essentially bails at the snap so he isn’t acting like a flat defender and it’s clear that the nickel has lock on the 2 receiver based on his demeanor regardless. Another thing that would confuse me is that Evans is lined up in the strong side a gap so is he cover 3 defender or a cover 2 defender? And if it were a true cover 3 on the strong side, there still doesn’t seem to be a clear indication that anyone was curl/flat defender. But regardless of all this, the broader issue I raise with the post is simply that there are better calls on 3rd and long against this team. Again, last weeks it’s a “brain fart” by a freshman…two weeks ago it was a brain fart by a red shirt senior.

  • ToatsMcGoats says:

    I just heard Tony Casillas and Dusty Dvoracek saying the exact same thing about this exact same play. They also said that, with this stuff happening in the 7th week of the season, it’s panic time. Scares the crap outta me.

    • Sooner Ray says:

      Good “morning” Toats! 🙂 There are several things going on that shouldn’t in this part of the season, I hope we can get to peak performance before another one slips by. I would assume that Bob has spent a lot more of his time at practice with the secondary, he does that anyway but I bet there was a lot more focus this week.

      • ToatsMcGoats says:

        Mornin’! I hope he really starts to tighten the leash on the asst. coaches. It seems like complacency is once again starting to creep in…I would have thought that a loss would have straightened all of this out.

  • Ed Cotter says:

    Thanks for going over this play and giving us a breakdown of how it all went down. That is the reason I can’t coach football. One guy messes up and it affects the play in all facets of this game.. In basketball if a guy messes up someone can cover, and giving up two points is a lot easier to get back than 6….or 7. Great job K, thanks.

  • Super Keith says:

    Good post K!

    With the inexperience at safety, it’s probably a good idea to simplify coverage in these kind’s of situations…at least until they can all get on the same page.

    I was also thinking about communication issues on this play. I know we had a couple of issues with communications in the TCU game, and things like this happen when one guy doesn’t get the correct call (or any call). Anyway, good analysis K.

  • Logan says:

    The bigger worry on this play is how he are overprotecting and under protecting parts of the back end here though. I get disguising your D, but by alignment I’d be throwing all day on Wilson. Just wait till Baylor if u wanna see REAL stressed out safety’s. Totally poor safety play by both Ahmad and Parker though. I get it Parker totally busted but I see what he was keying on and the weight of the defense was unbalanced and he rolled down instead of play center field. Also with Ahmad he was way too shallow over the top and if he played his third or half for the matter correctly he could of at least maybe challenged the play. Ahmad was in such poor position Harris could have ran post corner and Ahmad would still be toast(but who would run post corner with a wheel route underneath? Ahmad should have expected post to begin with after reading initial route). Opps…lol it happens especially to frosh. I don’t know about you guys but when I see a balanced ace set like they scored on how do you not automatically check two just so this situation doesn’t happen in the confusion on the rolling the the safety around on a balanced offense? Cover 3 can get confusing though, especially with our elaborate blitz packages and weighting guys in coverage all over the field. You wanna KISS it? Stay 2 or quarters on 3rd and long and I just might let ya.

  • L'carpetron Dookmarriot says:

    Was Steven Parker playing High School last year just asking for context purposes.